From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthew Garrett Subject: Re: [git pull] Input updates for 2.6.34-rc6 Date: Fri, 14 May 2010 19:49:31 +0100 Message-ID: <20100514184931.GA10113@srcf.ucam.org> References: <20100513075728.GF30110@core.coreip.homeip.net> <20100514145539.GA5598@srcf.ucam.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from cavan.codon.org.uk ([93.93.128.6]:47139 "EHLO cavan.codon.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758091Ab0ENSto (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 May 2010 14:49:44 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-input-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-input@vger.kernel.org To: david@lang.hm Cc: Linus Torvalds , Dmitry Torokhov , Andrew Morton , Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-input@vger.kernel.org, Bastien Nocera On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 11:47:43AM -0700, david@lang.hm wrote: > yes, everything has USB ports, so they could use USB keyboards, but it's > actually pretty common to still use PS/2 keyboards (and while the systems > all support USB, it's not uncommon to have KVM systems, including pretty > expensive 'enterprise' KVM systems that still require PS/2 keyboards be > used to plug into the KVM, so those are the keyboards that are in the > datacenter that someone will grab to plug into a problem machine) The server hardware I've looked at will all declare the ports regardless of whether or not there's something plugged in. -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org