From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] Suspend block api (version 6) Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 21:39:29 +0200 Message-ID: <201005182139.29783.rjw@sisk.pl> References: <1272667021-21312-1-git-send-email-arve@android.com> <4BF23BAC.90102@euromail.se> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4BF23BAC.90102@euromail.se> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org To: Henrik Rydberg Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , Sven Neumann , Jesse Barnes , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Dmitry Torokhov , Tero Saarni , linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org, Liam Girdwood , Alexey Dobriyan , Matthew Garrett , Len Brown , Jacob Pan , Daniel Mack , Oleg Nesterov , linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, Linus Walleij , Daniel Walker , Theodore Ts'o , =?iso-8859-1?q?M=E1rton_N=E9meth?= , Brian Swetland List-Id: linux-input@vger.kernel.org On Tuesday 18 May 2010, Henrik Rydberg wrote: > Arve Hj=F8nnev=E5g wrote: > > It does not matter how you enter suspend. Without opportunistic > > suspend, once you tell the kernel that you want to suspend, you cannot > > abort. If a wakeup event occurs at this point, it will probably not be > > processed until the system wakes up for another wakeup event. > > = > = > Since it seems to be at the very core of the argument, how long time does= it > take to suspend your system? Is it something that could be improved upon? It's not a matter of time. It's a matter of lost keystrokes and such. Rafael