From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dmitry Torokhov Subject: Re: Lost events in older kernels Date: Mon, 24 May 2010 10:48:13 -0700 Message-ID: <201005241048.13707.dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> References: <4BF7825F.2030405@seas.upenn.edu> <4BF88EA2.3040402@seas.upenn.edu> <4BF8EAE9.3050504@euromail.se> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail-px0-f174.google.com ([209.85.212.174]:62401 "EHLO mail-px0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758185Ab0EXRsh (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 May 2010 13:48:37 -0400 Received: by pxi18 with SMTP id 18so1551857pxi.19 for ; Mon, 24 May 2010 10:48:37 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4BF8EAE9.3050504@euromail.se> Sender: linux-input-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-input@vger.kernel.org To: Henrik Rydberg Cc: Rafi Rubin , linux-input , Jiri Kosina , Mika Kuoppala On Sunday 23 May 2010 01:44:25 am Henrik Rydberg wrote: > Rafi Rubin wrote: > [...] > > > Um, turns out I missed input_init_abs_bypass(void) in my backport, and > > for some reason get a bit of corruption ;) > > > > Sorry for the false alarm. > > If your code executed without bypassing event filtering, it would only mean > less events were sent, Right, and that would look like some events (multitouch ones) were dropped, whereas they were simply filtered out. > which would not void the argument. If you have > updated numbers, it would be very interesting to see them. Yes, we still need to think about [re]sizing event queue, especially for multi-touch devices. -- Dmitry