linux-input.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jarod Wilson <jarod@redhat.com>
To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
Cc: Jon Smirl <jonsmirl@gmail.com>,
	Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@gmail.com>,
	Jarod Wilson <jarod@wilsonet.com>,
	linux-input <linux-input@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-media@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Can I expect in-kernel decoding to work out of box?
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2010 14:05:16 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100728180516.GG26480@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4C50720D.5000301@redhat.com>

On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 03:08:13PM -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Em 28-07-2010 14:04, Jon Smirl escreveu:
> > On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 11:56 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
> > <mchehab@redhat.com> wrote:
> >> Em 28-07-2010 11:41, Jon Smirl escreveu:
> >>
> >>> It's possible to build a Linux IR decoder engine that can be loaded
> >>> with the old LIRC config files.
> >>
> >> I think it is a good idea to have a decoder that works with such files anyway.
> > 
> > The recorder should use the Linux IR system to record the data. It
> > would confusing to mix the systems. Users need to be really sure that
> > the standard protocol decoders don't understand their protocol before
> > resorting to this. Any one in this situation should post their
> > recorded data so we can check for driver implementation errors.
> > 
> > An example: if you use irrecord on Sony remotes lirc always records
> > them in raw mode. The true problem here is that irrecord doesn't
> > understand that Sony remotes mix different flavors of the Sony
> > protocol on a single remote. This leads you to think that the Sony
> > protocol engine is broken when it really isn't. It's the irrecord tool
> > that is broken.  The kernel IR system will decode these remotes
> > correctly without resorting to raw mode.
> 
> A decoder like that should be a last-resort decoder, only in the
> cases where there's no other option.
> 
> >> There are some good reasons for that, as it would allow in-kernel support for
> >> protocols that may have some patent restrictions on a few countries that allow
> >> patents on software.
> > 
> > Are there any IR protocols less than 20 (or 17) years old?
> 
> Yes. This protocol is brand new:
> 	https://www.smkusa.com/usa/technologies/qp/
> 
> And several new devices are starting to accept it.

The US patent appears to have been filed in 1995 and granted in 1997, so
"brand new" is relative. ;)

http://www.freepatentsonline.com/5640160.html

We do have a few more years of being encumbered by it here in the US
though. :(

-- 
Jarod Wilson
jarod@redhat.com

  reply	other threads:[~2010-07-28 18:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-07-27 22:33 Can I expect in-kernel decoding to work out of box? Maxim Levitsky
2010-07-27 23:32 ` Maxim Levitsky
2010-07-28  1:29   ` Jon Smirl
2010-07-28  2:33     ` Jarod Wilson
2010-07-28  6:30       ` Maxim Levitsky
2010-07-28  6:59         ` Maxim Levitsky
2010-07-28 10:40         ` Jon Smirl
2010-07-28 13:13           ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2010-07-28 13:46             ` Jon Smirl
2010-07-28 14:38               ` Andy Walls
2010-07-28 14:53                 ` Jon Smirl
2010-07-28 15:42                   ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2010-07-28 17:02                     ` Andy Walls
2010-07-28 17:35                       ` Jon Smirl
2010-07-28 18:18                         ` Andy Walls
2010-07-28 20:13                           ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2010-07-28 20:27                             ` Maxim Levitsky
2010-07-29  2:36                             ` Andy Walls
2010-07-29 11:58                               ` Jon Smirl
2010-07-28 18:29                       ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2010-07-28 14:24             ` Maxim Levitsky
2010-07-28 14:41               ` Jon Smirl
2010-07-28 15:18                 ` Jarod Wilson
2010-07-28 15:56                 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2010-07-28 17:04                   ` Jon Smirl
2010-07-28 17:21                     ` Andy Walls
2010-07-28 17:38                       ` Jon Smirl
2010-07-28 18:35                         ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2010-07-28 18:08                     ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2010-07-28 18:05                       ` Jarod Wilson [this message]
2010-07-28 18:40                         ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2010-07-28 21:01               ` Maxim Levitsky
2010-07-28 21:35                 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100728180516.GG26480@redhat.com \
    --to=jarod@redhat.com \
    --cc=jarod@wilsonet.com \
    --cc=jonsmirl@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maximlevitsky@gmail.com \
    --cc=mchehab@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).