From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jarod Wilson Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] Large scancode handling Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2010 10:31:21 -0400 Message-ID: <20100908143121.GD22323@redhat.com> References: <20100908073233.32365.74621.stgit@hammer.corenet.prv> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100908073233.32365.74621.stgit@hammer.corenet.prv> Sender: linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Dmitry Torokhov Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Linux Input , linux-media@vger.kernel.org, Maxim Levitsky , David Hardeman , Jiri Kosina , Ville Syrjala List-Id: linux-input@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 12:41:38AM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > Hi Mauro, > > I guess I better get off my behind and commit the changes to support large > scancodes, or they will not make to 2.6.37 either... There isn't much > changes, except I followed David's suggestion and changed boolean index > field into u8 flags field. Still, please glance it over once again and > shout if you see something you do not like. > > Jiri, how do you want to handle the changes to HID? I could either push > them through my tree together with the first patch or you can push through > yours once the first change hits mainline. > > Mauro, the same question goes for media/IR patch. > > David, I suppose you still have the winbond remote so you could test > changes to winbond-cir driver. This'll be fun. :) David recently posted a patchset that among other things, ports winbond-cir over to {ir,rc}-core to the tune of ~700 less lines in winbond-cir.c. It also touches a fair amount of core bits, as does a patchset posted by Maxim... I suspect this series should probably go in first though. > Ville, do you still have the hardware to try our ati_remote2 changes? If not, I've got the hardware. (Speaking of which, porting ati_remote* over to {ir,rc}-core is also on the TODO list, albeit with very very low priority at the moment). -- Jarod Wilson jarod@redhat.com