From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dmitry Torokhov Subject: Re: [linux-pm] wacom + runtime PM = AA deadlock Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2010 17:52:10 -0700 Message-ID: <20100914005209.GB27540@core.coreip.homeip.net> References: <4C8E180D.4020309@suse.cz> <201009131656.18199.oneukum@suse.de> <20100913171046.GA23116@core.coreip.homeip.net> <201009132120.23372.oliver@neukum.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mail-gy0-f174.google.com ([209.85.160.174]:45920 "EHLO mail-gy0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752103Ab0INAwQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Sep 2010 20:52:16 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201009132120.23372.oliver@neukum.org> Sender: linux-input-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-input@vger.kernel.org To: Oliver Neukum Cc: linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org, pingc@wacom.com, Jiri Slaby , Linux kernel mailing list , linux-input@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 09:20:23PM +0200, Oliver Neukum wrote: > Am Montag, 13. September 2010, 19:10:47 schrieb Dmitry Torokhov: > > > I think this introduces significant change in behavior though - before > > we did not do usb_autopm_put_interface() on successful open, basically > > disabling autopm facilities, right? > > Right. Which makes no sense at all. You'd better remove anything related > to runtime PM and not set supports_autosuspend for that. > That not what I meant, I do not want to remove autopm, it's just it was effectively disabled and if we fix it we might start getting some regression reports ;) -- Dmitry