From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dmitry Torokhov Subject: Re: [RFC] Multi-Touch (MT) support - arbitration or not Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2010 22:59:33 -0800 Message-ID: <20101109065933.GA13921@core.coreip.homeip.net> References: <20101108035121.GA4630@barra.bne.redhat.com> <4CD7B012.1030809@cena.fr> <20101109033149.GC19313@barra.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mail-gy0-f174.google.com ([209.85.160.174]:63942 "EHLO mail-gy0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751204Ab0KIG7l (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Nov 2010 01:59:41 -0500 Received: by gyh4 with SMTP id 4so4054678gyh.19 for ; Mon, 08 Nov 2010 22:59:41 -0800 (PST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20101109033149.GC19313@barra.redhat.com> Sender: linux-input-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-input@vger.kernel.org To: Peter Hutterer Cc: Chris Bagwell , Benjamin Tissoires , Ping Cheng , "X.Org Devel List" , Daniel Stone , linux-input On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 01:31:49PM +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote: > > That said, it also goes counter the whole multi-touch approach - allowing > more than one device on a single physical device. > So maybe we should teach wacom to handle all devices as a single input device even in cases when they use several USB interfaces? We should be able to detect related interfaces by examining intf->intf_assoc (I hope) and using usb_driver_claim_interface() to claim them. -- Dmitry