linux-input.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
To: Valentine Barshak <vbarshak@mvista.com>
Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>,
	linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-input@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] USB: USBHID: Fix race between disconnect and hiddev_ioctl
Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2010 15:16:12 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101203231611.GB22969@core.coreip.homeip.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101203172746.GA31045@mvista.com>

On Fri, Dec 03, 2010 at 08:27:46PM +0300, Valentine Barshak wrote:
> A USB HID device can be disconnected at any time.
> If this happens right before or while hiddev_ioctl is in progress,
> the hiddev_ioctl tries to access invalid hiddev->hid pointer.
> When the hid device is disconnected, the hiddev_disconnect()
> ends up with a call to hid_device_release() which frees
> hid_device, but doesn't set the hiddev->hid pointer to NULL.
> If the deallocated memory region has been re-used by the kernel,
> this can cause a crash or memory corruption.
> 
> Since disconnect can happen at any time, we can't initialize
> struct hid_device *hid = hiddev->hid at the beginning of ioctl
> and then use it.
> 
> This change checks hiddev->exist flag while holding
> the existancelock and uses hid_device only if it exists.

Why didn't you take the lock and check hiddev->exist at the beginning of
ioctl handler instead of pushing it down into individual command
handlers? I guess it would slow down HIDIOCGVERSION but I think we could
pay this price for code that is more clear ;)

-- 
Dmitry

  reply	other threads:[~2010-12-03 23:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-12-03 17:27 [PATCH] USB: USBHID: Fix race between disconnect and hiddev_ioctl Valentine Barshak
2010-12-03 23:16 ` Dmitry Torokhov [this message]
     [not found]   ` <20101203231611.GB22969-WlK9ik9hQGAhIp7JRqBPierSzoNAToWh@public.gmane.org>
2010-12-03 23:31     ` Valentine Barshak
2010-12-04 20:22   ` Oliver Neukum
     [not found]     ` <201012042122.23852.oliver-GvhC2dPhHPQdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2010-12-04 20:37       ` Dmitry Torokhov
2010-12-06 14:03         ` Valentine Barshak
2010-12-06 15:25           ` Valentine Barshak
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-12-03 17:52 Valentine Barshak

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20101203231611.GB22969@core.coreip.homeip.net \
    --to=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
    --cc=jkosina@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vbarshak@mvista.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).