From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dmitry Torokhov Subject: Re: rotary encoder patches? Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2011 23:40:37 -0800 Message-ID: <20110208074037.GB865@core.coreip.homeip.net> References: <201102021433.23687.alexander.stein@systec-electronic.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mail-iw0-f174.google.com ([209.85.214.174]:55398 "EHLO mail-iw0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751886Ab1BHHkp (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Feb 2011 02:40:45 -0500 Received: by iwn9 with SMTP id 9so5456021iwn.19 for ; Mon, 07 Feb 2011 23:40:44 -0800 (PST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201102021433.23687.alexander.stein@systec-electronic.com> Sender: linux-input-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-input@vger.kernel.org To: Alexander Stein Cc: linux-input@vger.kernel.org Hi Alexander, On Wed, Feb 02, 2011 at 02:33:23PM +0100, Alexander Stein wrote: > Hello, > > I've found those 3 patches on input patchwork: > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/99004/ > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/99005/ > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/99006/ > > The entries don't state if they will get accepted or rejected. > Especially the first one changes the behavior as most encoders do work. > Can somebody put a few lines about the current state? > I was waiting for Daniel's response. I can see that the 3rd one could be useful but needs some cleaning up. Thanks. -- Dmitry