From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tony Lindgren Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 3/3] OMAP4:keypad: PM runtime Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2011 14:58:18 -0800 Message-ID: <20110223225817.GD30316@atomide.com> References: <1293429106-16543-1-git-send-email-shubhrajyoti@ti.com> <1293429106-16543-2-git-send-email-shubhrajyoti@ti.com> <1293429106-16543-3-git-send-email-shubhrajyoti@ti.com> <1293429106-16543-4-git-send-email-shubhrajyoti@ti.com> <4D50FF42.1070401@ti.com> <4D5F33E3.7000501@ti.com> <20110219053111.GA6991@core.coreip.homeip.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110219053111.GA6991@core.coreip.homeip.net> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Dmitry Torokhov Cc: Shubhrajyoti , linux-input@vger.kernel.org, Abraham Arce , Kevin Hilman , linux-omap@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-input@vger.kernel.org * Dmitry Torokhov [110218 21:29]: > Hi Shubhrajyoti, > > On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 08:37:15AM +0530, Shubhrajyoti wrote: > > Hello Dmitry, > > If there are no further comments. > > Can it be queued? > > I normally try not to merge board code leaving it to arch owner. Can we > at least get arch/board maintainer ACKs on this? The omap4 hwmod data should be now queued so that patch needs to be refreshed to just uncomment omap44xx_kbd_hwmod entry in what we have queued up in the omap tree. To avoid conflicts there it's probably best that I take the arch/arm/*omap*/* patches. Patch 3/3 should not do anything until the hwmod changes are merged, so Dmitry can you please take that one? Regards, Tony