From: "Henrik Rydberg" <rydberg@euromail.se>
To: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@enac.fr>
Cc: "Jiri Kosina" <jkosina@suse.cz>,
"Dmitry Torokhov" <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>,
"Stéphane Chatty" <chatty@enac.fr>,
linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hid: Do not create input devices for feature reports
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 21:43:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110224204300.GA2423@polaris.bitmath.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=VfSbbV5xwpacC+8yDUfjR3-S8OW47YPvtZwFX@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 08:50:55PM +0100, Benjamin Tissoires wrote:
> Hi Henrik,
>
> Thanks for spotting this. BTW, I'm not happy with your solution.
>
> You are sending the feature report before creating the struct
> hid_input. To be consistent with the rest, we have to keep the same
> signature. Today, the code does not make any use of it. But I use it
> in my devel branch to auto-detect the maximum contact count of the
> device. This was the safest place to call input_mt_init_slots.
Well, the whole point is "which input device". It would only be
well-defined when the hid device has a single input device. The
feature callback could be called last, however, if that helps.
> How about adding hidinput as an argument to report_features
>
> and calling it after the " for (k = HID_INPUT_REPORT; k <=
> HID_OUTPUT_REPORT; k++) {" loop with
>
> list_for_each_entry_safe(hidinput, next, &hid->inputs, list)
> report_features(hid, hidinput);
>
> I did not even try to compile it right now (I don't have any
> multitouch device right now) but I'll be able to make further tests
> tomorrow.
Thanks,
Henrik
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-24 20:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-24 18:30 [PATCH] hid: Do not create input devices for feature reports Henrik Rydberg
2011-02-24 19:50 ` Benjamin Tissoires
2011-02-24 20:43 ` Henrik Rydberg [this message]
2011-02-25 11:18 ` Benjamin Tissoires
2011-02-25 17:19 ` Henrik Rydberg
2011-03-01 17:54 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-03-02 15:02 ` Henrik Rydberg
2011-03-03 8:07 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-03-01 16:03 ` Jiri Kosina
2011-03-01 16:21 ` Benjamin Tissoires
2011-03-01 16:26 ` Jiri Kosina
2011-03-08 3:44 ` Rafi Rubin
2011-03-10 16:16 ` Henrik Rydberg
2011-03-10 18:00 ` Jiri Kosina
2011-03-10 18:04 ` Henrik Rydberg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110224204300.GA2423@polaris.bitmath.org \
--to=rydberg@euromail.se \
--cc=benjamin.tissoires@enac.fr \
--cc=chatty@enac.fr \
--cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=jkosina@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).