From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Henrik Rydberg" Subject: Re: [PATCH] hid: Do not create input devices for feature reports Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 19:04:55 +0100 Message-ID: <20110310180455.GA24888@polaris.bitmath.org> References: <1298572259-18173-1-git-send-email-rydberg@euromail.se> <20110310161635.GA23223@polaris.bitmath.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from ch-smtp03.sth.basefarm.net ([80.76.149.214]:53201 "EHLO ch-smtp03.sth.basefarm.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751592Ab1CJSCc (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Mar 2011 13:02:32 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-input-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-input@vger.kernel.org To: Jiri Kosina Cc: Benjamin Tissoires , Dmitry Torokhov , linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > I was wondering if this patch will appear in the final 2.6.38? It > > seems the regression it fixes is pretty severe for ntrig devices, and > > once out there, the callback argument change will create problems for > > add-on modules such as dkms modules. > > Hi Henrik, > > I am not sure Linus will be taking it for .38 still, as he is now offline > and will be releasing final .38 after he appears, so it's unlikely that > he'll take pull requests unless it's something super-severe. > > I'll put it on my list of commits to be pushed out to 38-stable right > away. Does that make sense? Yes, that will be great. Thanks! Henrik