From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: "Péter Ujfalusi" <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>
Cc: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>,
"Girdwood, Liam" <lrg@ti.com>, Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>,
"linux-input@vger.kernel.org" <linux-input@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"alsa-devel@alsa-project.org" <alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>,
"Lopez Cruz, Misael" <misael.lopez@ti.com>
Subject: Re: Re: Re: [PATCH v4 11/18] input: Add initial support for TWL6040 vibrator
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 09:31:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110614073130.GF8141@htj.dyndns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8556714.NHVg2d8yTv@barack>
Hello,
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 10:17:10AM +0300, Péter Ujfalusi wrote:
> The latency in most cases comes from the fact, that we are running an embedded
> system. Number of peripherals are connected via I2C, these drivers are using
> workqueues to communicate with the IC.
> Since only one device can communicate through I2C at the time. This is
> basically the source of the latency. It does not really matter, if the devices
> are on the same I2C bus or not, it is enough if two work belonging to device,
> which happens to be on the same I2C bus, and the first work in the queue takes
> long time to complete (reading back bigger chunk of info, configuring, etc).
> Even if we could schedule the second work on the other CPU, it will be put
> waiting till the I2C bus is free, so both CPU core has work assigned, the
> first is keeping the I2C bus, the other waits for the I2C bus, and the third
> is waiting to be scheduled (which will be happening, when the first work
> finished).
> IMHO the tactile feedback (vibra) should have an excuse to have separate WQ to
> avoid latency spikes.
> I agree, that most cases we can use the global wq.
Thanks for the explanation. I have a couple more questions.
* While transferring data from I2C, I suppose the work item is fully
occupying the CPU? If so, how long delay are we talking about?
Millisecs?
* You said that the if one task is accessing I2C bus, the other would
wait even if scheduled on a different CPU. Is access to I2C bus
protected with a spinlock?
Also, as it's currently implemented, single threaded wq's effectively
bypass concurrency level control. This is an implementation detail
which may change in the future, so even if you're seeing lower latency
by using a separate single threaded wq, it's an accident and if you
require lower latency you should be expressing the requirement
explicitly.
Thank you.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-14 7:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-10 11:54 [PATCH v4 00/18] MFD/ASoC/Input: TWL4030/TWL60X0 changes Peter Ujfalusi
2011-06-10 11:54 ` [PATCH v4 01/18] OMAP: New twl-common for common TWL configuration Peter Ujfalusi
2011-06-10 11:54 ` [PATCH v4 02/18] OMAP4: Move common twl6030 configuration to twl-common Peter Ujfalusi
2011-06-10 11:54 ` [PATCH v4 03/18] OMAP3: Move common twl " Peter Ujfalusi
2011-06-10 11:54 ` [PATCH v4 04/18] OMAP3: Move common regulator " Peter Ujfalusi
2011-06-10 11:54 ` [PATCH v4 05/18] MFD: twl4030-codec: Rename internals from codec to audio Peter Ujfalusi
2011-06-10 11:54 ` [PATCH v4 06/18] MFD: twl4030-codec -> twl4030-audio: Rename the driver Peter Ujfalusi
2011-06-10 11:54 ` [PATCH v4 07/18] MFD: twl4030-audio: Rename platform data Peter Ujfalusi
2011-06-10 11:54 ` [PATCH v4 08/18] mfd: twl6040: Add initial support Peter Ujfalusi
2011-06-10 11:54 ` [PATCH v4 09/18] ASoC: twl6040: Convert into TWL6040 MFD child Peter Ujfalusi
2011-06-10 11:54 ` [PATCH v4 10/18] MFD: twl6040: Change platform data for soc codec driver Peter Ujfalusi
2011-06-10 11:54 ` [PATCH v4 11/18] input: Add initial support for TWL6040 vibrator Peter Ujfalusi
2011-06-11 23:18 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-06-13 9:51 ` Péter Ujfalusi
2011-06-13 21:20 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-06-14 6:34 ` Tejun Heo
2011-06-14 7:17 ` Péter Ujfalusi
2011-06-14 7:31 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2011-06-14 7:51 ` Péter Ujfalusi
2011-06-14 8:18 ` Re: Re: " Tejun Heo
2011-06-14 10:22 ` Péter Ujfalusi
2011-06-15 8:18 ` Re: Re: Re: " Tejun Heo
2011-06-15 8:23 ` Tejun Heo
2011-06-16 11:13 ` Péter Ujfalusi
2011-06-16 12:02 ` Re: Re: Re: Re: " Tejun Heo
2011-06-16 14:06 ` Péter Ujfalusi
2011-06-17 9:39 ` Péter Ujfalusi
2011-06-17 9:43 ` Re: [alsa-devel] " Tejun Heo
2011-06-17 10:59 ` Péter Ujfalusi
2011-06-18 14:57 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-06-18 15:36 ` Re: Re: [alsa-devel] " Tejun Heo
2011-06-10 11:54 ` [PATCH v4 12/18] OMAP4: SDP4430: Add twl6040 vibrator platform support Peter Ujfalusi
2011-06-10 11:54 ` [PATCH v4 13/18] ASoC: twl6040: add all ABE DAIs Peter Ujfalusi
2011-06-10 11:54 ` [PATCH v4 14/18] ASoC: twl6040: Support other sample rates in constraints Peter Ujfalusi
2011-06-10 11:54 ` [PATCH v4 15/18] ASoC: twl6040: Remove pll and headset mode dependency Peter Ujfalusi
2011-06-10 11:54 ` [PATCH v4 16/18] ASoC: twl6040: set default constraints Peter Ujfalusi
2011-06-10 11:54 ` [PATCH v4 17/18] ASoC: twl6040: Configure ramp step based on platform Peter Ujfalusi
2011-06-10 11:54 ` [PATCH v4 18/18] OMAP4: SDP4430: Add twl6040 codec platform support Peter Ujfalusi
2011-06-17 10:06 ` [PATCH v4 00/18] MFD/ASoC/Input: TWL4030/TWL60X0 changes Péter Ujfalusi
2011-06-17 9:39 ` Mark Brown
2011-06-17 10:53 ` Péter Ujfalusi
2011-06-17 9:51 ` Mark Brown
2011-06-17 10:57 ` Péter Ujfalusi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110614073130.GF8141@htj.dyndns.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lrg@ti.com \
--cc=misael.lopez@ti.com \
--cc=peter.ujfalusi@ti.com \
--cc=sameo@linux.intel.com \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).