From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dmitry Torokhov Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] Input: elantech: add support for newer hardware Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2011 23:10:51 -0700 Message-ID: <20110824061051.GA15604@core.coreip.homeip.net> References: <1314164303-30382-1-git-send-email-jj_ding@emc.com.tw> <87wre31hnu.fsf@emc.com.tw> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mail-gy0-f174.google.com ([209.85.160.174]:46809 "EHLO mail-gy0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751057Ab1HXGK5 (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Aug 2011 02:10:57 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87wre31hnu.fsf@emc.com.tw> Sender: linux-input-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-input@vger.kernel.org To: JJ Ding Cc: linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Seth Forshee , Aaron Huang , Tom Lin , =?iso-8859-1?Q?=C9ric?= Piel , Daniel Kurtz , Chase Douglas , Henrik Rydberg , Alessandro Rubini Hi JJ, On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 01:51:17PM +0800, JJ Ding wrote: > Sorry. > linux-kernel and linux-input complains patch #2's subject > ETP_2FT_XXXX looks like spam. > (5.1.0 - Unknown address error 550-'5.7.1 Content-Policy reject msg: The > capital Triple-X in subject is way too often associated with junk email, > please rephrase. BF:; S1752956Ab1HXFgV' > ) > so patch #2 is blocked. > Please ignore this series. > I will rephase and resend. Just resend that one patch changing subject to ETP_2FT_* or similar... No need to resend the rest of the patches. Thanks. -- Dmitry