From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dmitry Torokhov Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] TSC-40: fix checkstyle issues Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2011 09:37:22 -0700 Message-ID: <20110913163722.GB2915@core.coreip.homeip.net> References: <20110913084720.GB27776@linutronix.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mail-gy0-f174.google.com ([209.85.160.174]:63104 "EHLO mail-gy0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753662Ab1IMQh1 (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Sep 2011 12:37:27 -0400 Received: by gyg10 with SMTP id 10so608793gyg.19 for ; Tue, 13 Sep 2011 09:37:26 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110913084720.GB27776@linutronix.de> Sender: linux-input-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-input@vger.kernel.org To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior Cc: Christian Gmeiner , linux-input@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 10:47:20AM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > * Christian Gmeiner | 2011-09-13 10:18:35 [+0200]: > > >Subject: [PATCH 2/3] TSC40: fix checkstyle issues > > > >This patch fixes all found problems. > > Besides the checkpatch fixes you also increased the msleep delay. For > the checkpatch part it is probably better in include it in the previous > patch unless Dmitry prefers something different. The same goes probably > for the msleep part but pleae denote why this was required. Yes, please fold the cleanup patches into the original patch. Thanks. -- Dmitry