From: "Henrik Rydberg" <rydberg@euromail.se>
To: Daniel Kurtz <djkurtz@chromium.org>
Cc: dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com, linux-input@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Input: evdev - use monotonic clock for event timestamps
Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2011 11:23:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111005092341.GB6840@polaris.bitmath.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGS+omAj9z2-Au2HABtDKHQGRBNVxXygF2cz+L8UMeTHRrMjbA@mail.gmail.com>
> I understand your concern about breaking random drivers, and am hoping
> that someon on this list could indicate whether this is a real concern
> or not. To get a better feeling for possible regressions, I checked
> xf86-input-evdev & -synaptics, and neither uses the evdev timestamp in
> their current incarnations. Any idea what else might be a good place
> to check?
The input system is used for all sorts of events - switches, for
instance. The point is that it is nearly impossible to know if
something will break or not, hence the reluctance to modify interfaces.
> One option is to make the evdev timestamp clock source a per-driver
> configuration option (controllable from userspace?). This sounds like
> it is doable, but would be significantly more complicated.
>
> Another option would be to timestamp with monotonicraw + boottime +
> sleeptime. This would be approximately wall clock time, but without
> ntp and slew adjustments. But, I fear this would just make the rare
> driver issue less obvious, since it would only become obvious when the
> two clock sources started drifting apart.
I agree, the problem is not really solvable. Dmitry?
Thanks,
Henrik
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-10-05 9:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-10-03 6:43 [PATCH] Input: evdev - use monotonic clock for event timestamps Daniel Kurtz
2011-10-03 9:06 ` Henrik Rydberg
2011-10-05 7:55 ` Daniel Kurtz
2011-10-05 9:23 ` Henrik Rydberg [this message]
2011-10-05 14:35 ` Chase Douglas
2011-10-06 3:42 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-10-06 6:25 ` Daniel Kurtz
2011-10-07 6:36 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-10-07 11:05 ` Henrik Rydberg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111005092341.GB6840@polaris.bitmath.org \
--to=rydberg@euromail.se \
--cc=djkurtz@chromium.org \
--cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).