From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dmitry Torokhov Subject: Re: [PATCH V3] input: Fix USB autosuspend on bcm5974 Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2011 09:05:44 -0700 Message-ID: <20111011160544.GC10286@core.coreip.homeip.net> References: <1318261630-24044-1-git-send-email-mjg@redhat.com> <20111010224431.GA2377@polaris.bitmath.org> <20111011001102.GA28157@srcf.ucam.org> <201110110610.12999.oliver@neukum.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mail-pz0-f42.google.com ([209.85.210.42]:40492 "EHLO mail-pz0-f42.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754883Ab1JKQFv (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Oct 2011 12:05:51 -0400 Received: by pzk1 with SMTP id 1so19206255pzk.1 for ; Tue, 11 Oct 2011 09:05:50 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201110110610.12999.oliver@neukum.org> Sender: linux-input-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-input@vger.kernel.org To: Oliver Neukum Cc: Matthew Garrett , Alan Stern , Henrik Rydberg , linux-input@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 06:10:12AM +0200, Oliver Neukum wrote: > Am Dienstag, 11. Oktober 2011, 02:11:03 schrieb Matthew Garrett: > > > Ah, right, sorry - I wasn't trying to use the device after it had been > > closed. In an ideal world we'd really want to be able to indicate that > > we don't want a remote wakeup in that situation. Otherwise, the patch > > looks good. Thank you! > > It looks like we had exactly that capability until > 48826626263d4a61d06fd8c5805da31f925aefa0 > removed it. > Hmm, reading Alan's comment I can see why wakeup might be beneficial when system is in the sleep state, but while it is running and there is no driver or driver wants to disable wakeups I think we should accommodate it. Thanks. -- Dmitry