linux-input.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>
To: Oliver Neukum <oliver@neukum.org>
Cc: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>,
	Henrik Rydberg <rydberg@euromail.se>,
	linux-input@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3] input: Fix USB autosuspend on bcm5974
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2011 14:54:39 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111012135439.GA25266@srcf.ucam.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201110120903.00651.oliver@neukum.org>

On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 09:03:00AM +0200, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 11. Oktober 2011, 18:43:55 schrieb Alan Stern:
> > On Tue, 11 Oct 2011, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
>  
> > > Hmm, reading Alan's comment I can see why wakeup might be beneficial
> > > when system is in the sleep state, but while it is running and there is
> > > no driver or driver wants to disable wakeups I think we should
> > > accommodate it.
> > 
> > Currently, wakeup is enabled for USB devices during autosuspend if and
> > only if one or more of the interface drivers has set the
> > intf->needs_remote_wakeup flag.  Therefore all that usbhid should need 
> > to do is clear that flag when the device file is closed.
> 
> Now I am confused because Matthew reported that his device generated
> remote wakeups without setting needs_remote_wakeup at all.
> Matthew, could you clarify?

I /think/ Alan's wrong here - do_remote_wakeup is set to
device_may_wakeup(), which will be true if the device can generate 
remote wakeups even if nothing's asked for them. I'm basing this on 
autosuspend_check() and choose_wakeup(). Alan, am I misinterpreting this 
code?

-- 
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org

  reply	other threads:[~2011-10-12 13:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-10-10 15:47 [PATCH V3] input: Fix USB autosuspend on bcm5974 Matthew Garrett
2011-10-10 21:05 ` Henrik Rydberg
2011-10-10 21:12   ` Matthew Garrett
2011-10-10 22:44     ` Henrik Rydberg
2011-10-11  0:11       ` Matthew Garrett
2011-10-11  4:10         ` Oliver Neukum
2011-10-11 11:04           ` Henrik Rydberg
2011-10-11 11:09             ` Oliver Neukum
2011-10-11 20:42               ` Matthew Garrett
2011-10-12  6:32                 ` Oliver Neukum
2011-10-12 14:33                   ` Alan Stern
2011-10-12 14:37                     ` Oliver Neukum
2011-10-12 15:28                       ` Alan Stern
2011-10-12 16:16                         ` Matthew Garrett
2011-10-12 16:56                           ` Oliver Neukum
2011-10-12 16:59                             ` Matthew Garrett
2011-10-12 17:24                               ` Alan Stern
2011-10-12 17:26                                 ` Matthew Garrett
2011-10-12 17:41                                   ` Alan Stern
2011-10-12 18:33                               ` Henrik Rydberg
2011-10-12 19:21                                 ` Alan Stern
2011-10-13  8:20                                   ` Henrik Rydberg
2011-10-13 15:49                                     ` Alan Stern
2011-10-13 17:21                                       ` Henrik Rydberg
2011-10-12 17:11                         ` Oliver Neukum
2011-10-12 19:18                           ` Alan Stern
2011-10-11 16:05           ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-10-11 16:43             ` Alan Stern
2011-10-12  7:03               ` Oliver Neukum
2011-10-12 13:54                 ` Matthew Garrett [this message]
2011-10-12 14:18                   ` Alan Stern
2011-10-12 14:26                     ` Matthew Garrett
2011-10-12 14:38                       ` Oliver Neukum
2011-10-12 18:50                         ` Henrik Rydberg
2011-10-13  6:47                           ` Oliver Neukum
2011-10-10 21:16   ` Matthew Garrett

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20111012135439.GA25266@srcf.ucam.org \
    --to=mjg59@srcf.ucam.org \
    --cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=oliver@neukum.org \
    --cc=rydberg@euromail.se \
    --cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).