From: "Henrik Rydberg" <rydberg@euromail.se>
To: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>,
Oliver Neukum <oliver@neukum.org>,
linux-input@vger.kernel.org, dtor@mail.ru
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3] input: Fix USB autosuspend on bcm5974
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2011 10:20:16 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111013082016.GA2209@polaris.bitmath.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.1110121518510.2093-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>
> It's always a bug. However, the patch I sent to Matthew should fix the
> immediate problem.
>
> In fact, the original autosuspend design intended to allow drivers to
> do this -- keep devices awake by failing suspend requests even though
> the usage count is 0. Under some conditions, that's the approach with
> the least overhead. But the code to handle this got lost by mistake,
> so now it needs to be added back.
I tried the patch out, unfortunately it did not work. The second
suspend request returns with a -EINPROGRESS, here:
if (dev->power.runtime_status == RPM_SUSPENDING) {
DEFINE_WAIT(wait);
if (rpmflags & (RPM_ASYNC | RPM_NOWAIT)) {
retval = -EINPROGRESS;
goto out;
}
/* Wait for the other suspend running in parallel with us. */
for (;;) {
The reason is above my horizon, although RPM_ASYNC looks suspicious.
In general, we are re-entering rpm_suspend from within the driver
handler, so the exit condition of rpm_suspend may not have been
satisfied yet.
Thanks,
Henrik
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-10-13 8:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-10-10 15:47 [PATCH V3] input: Fix USB autosuspend on bcm5974 Matthew Garrett
2011-10-10 21:05 ` Henrik Rydberg
2011-10-10 21:12 ` Matthew Garrett
2011-10-10 22:44 ` Henrik Rydberg
2011-10-11 0:11 ` Matthew Garrett
2011-10-11 4:10 ` Oliver Neukum
2011-10-11 11:04 ` Henrik Rydberg
2011-10-11 11:09 ` Oliver Neukum
2011-10-11 20:42 ` Matthew Garrett
2011-10-12 6:32 ` Oliver Neukum
2011-10-12 14:33 ` Alan Stern
2011-10-12 14:37 ` Oliver Neukum
2011-10-12 15:28 ` Alan Stern
2011-10-12 16:16 ` Matthew Garrett
2011-10-12 16:56 ` Oliver Neukum
2011-10-12 16:59 ` Matthew Garrett
2011-10-12 17:24 ` Alan Stern
2011-10-12 17:26 ` Matthew Garrett
2011-10-12 17:41 ` Alan Stern
2011-10-12 18:33 ` Henrik Rydberg
2011-10-12 19:21 ` Alan Stern
2011-10-13 8:20 ` Henrik Rydberg [this message]
2011-10-13 15:49 ` Alan Stern
2011-10-13 17:21 ` Henrik Rydberg
2011-10-12 17:11 ` Oliver Neukum
2011-10-12 19:18 ` Alan Stern
2011-10-11 16:05 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-10-11 16:43 ` Alan Stern
2011-10-12 7:03 ` Oliver Neukum
2011-10-12 13:54 ` Matthew Garrett
2011-10-12 14:18 ` Alan Stern
2011-10-12 14:26 ` Matthew Garrett
2011-10-12 14:38 ` Oliver Neukum
2011-10-12 18:50 ` Henrik Rydberg
2011-10-13 6:47 ` Oliver Neukum
2011-10-10 21:16 ` Matthew Garrett
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111013082016.GA2209@polaris.bitmath.org \
--to=rydberg@euromail.se \
--cc=dtor@mail.ru \
--cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mjg59@srcf.ucam.org \
--cc=oliver@neukum.org \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).