From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
To: riyer <riyer-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Cc: "rydberg-Hk7bIW8heu4wFerOooGFRg@public.gmane.org"
<rydberg-Hk7bIW8heu4wFerOooGFRg@public.gmane.org>,
Stephen Warren <swarren-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
Laxman Dewangan
<ldewangan-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
"linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
<linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
"linux-input-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
<linux-input-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
"linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
<linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] Input: tegra-kbc - report wakeup key for some platforms.
Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2011 20:27:36 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111205042736.GA23733@core.coreip.homeip.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1323047897.3056.14.camel-73r3X0hAYrhxWE4FnwvcdlaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org>
On Sun, Dec 04, 2011 at 05:18:17PM -0800, riyer wrote:
> Hello Dmitry.
> Please find replies inline.
>
> On Sun, 2011-12-04 at 00:50 -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > Hi Rakesh,
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 01:09:59PM -0800, Rakesh Iyer wrote:
> > > Hello Dmitry.
> > >
> > > Sorry for the wrap issue, my Outlook does not seem to obey the settings.
> > >
> > > I wanted to explain the tegra system resume path implementation so I can justify
> > > why I am doing this complicated fix and why I feel it will guarantee the resume
> > > is due to keypress.
> > >
> > > The tegra wake resume code is registered as a syscore ops.
> > > When the system is resumed due to a wake event, the suspend_enter (after wakeup)
> > > routine will invoke the tegra syscoreops_resume method and that routine will propagate
> > > the wake event to the individual ISR's through genirq.
> > > If kbc was wake source, kbc_isr will be invoked in this execution path.
> > >
> > > If system is resumed due to other reason, the tegra_syscoreops_resume code will not
> > > find the event.
> >
> > Consider the following sequence:
> >
> > 1. Something other than keyboard generates wakeup event
> > 2. It's IRQ fires up and gets serviced
> At this point syscoreops_resume has finished all its wakeup processing.
>
> > 3. System starts resuming devices
> > 4. User presses a key on the keypad while it is still suspended _and_
> > registered as a wakeup source
> This will have no impact on the system and keypad ISR will not be
> invoked.
> > 5. Keypad's ISR runs as well and you decide that KEY_POWER should be
> > reported even though keypad wasn't the real reason the system
> > woke up.
> The interrupt line we use to detect wakeup processing is the keypress
> interrupt which is disabled and will never cause the ISR invocation from
> a device interrupt(i.e. the PIC).
>
> In other words KBC isr gets invoked for 2 reasons
> a) FIFO interrupt is generated, which will not happen as long as
> scanning logic is disabled until kbc_resume executes.
> b) The syscoreops_resume codepath calls into the ISR after finding KBC
> was a wakesource. If this happens it will happen only when the kernel
> resumes from its suspend code path.
Is this code already in mainline or still somewhere else?
> >
> > Is this scenario not possible?
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> With that being the case do you think the fix makes sense?
OK, yes. I do not think it is that important if we occasionally report
KEY_POWER even if KBC was not a true wakeup source but that's fine.
Thanks.
--
Dmitry
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-12-05 4:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-11-30 20:43 [PATCH v1] Input: tegra-kbc - report wakeup key for some platforms riyer-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA
[not found] ` <1322685811-14060-1-git-send-email-riyer-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2011-11-30 21:07 ` Stephen Warren
2011-11-30 21:20 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-11-30 22:14 ` Rakesh Iyer
[not found] ` <1FC56210173BB445BD77F608D6FB8D034F3D1BB4BD-lR+7xdUAJVNDw2glCA4ptUEOCMrvLtNR@public.gmane.org>
2011-12-01 7:26 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-12-01 21:09 ` Rakesh Iyer
[not found] ` <1FC56210173BB445BD77F608D6FB8D034F3D1BB4C9-lR+7xdUAJVNDw2glCA4ptUEOCMrvLtNR@public.gmane.org>
2011-12-04 8:50 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-12-05 1:18 ` riyer
[not found] ` <1323047897.3056.14.camel-73r3X0hAYrhxWE4FnwvcdlaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org>
2011-12-05 4:27 ` Dmitry Torokhov [this message]
2011-12-05 5:52 ` Rakesh Iyer
2011-12-29 10:32 ` Dmitry Torokhov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111205042736.GA23733@core.coreip.homeip.net \
--to=dmitry.torokhov-re5jqeeqqe8avxtiumwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=ldewangan-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-input-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=riyer-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=rydberg-Hk7bIW8heu4wFerOooGFRg@public.gmane.org \
--cc=swarren-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).