From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Anton Vorontsov Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] power_supply: add power supply scope Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2011 13:59:25 +0400 Message-ID: <20111209095925.GA19883@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru> References: <4EDE4C7A.1010802@goop.org> <4EDFA192.7000602@goop.org> <4EE015D1.5070005@goop.org> <20111208104127.GA1753@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru> <4EE0EB7B.6060807@goop.org> <20111208233643.GA19022@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru> <4EE1C467.9050607@goop.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Return-path: Received: from mail-bw0-f46.google.com ([209.85.214.46]:36056 "EHLO mail-bw0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751051Ab1LIJ7b (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Dec 2011 04:59:31 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4EE1C467.9050607@goop.org> Sender: linux-input-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-input@vger.kernel.org To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge Cc: David Woodhouse , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Richard Hughes , Daniel Nicoletti , linux-input@vger.kernel.org, Jiri Kosina , vojtech@ucw.cz, Przemo Firszt , Richard Hughes On Fri, Dec 09, 2011 at 12:18:47AM -0800, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: > On 12/08/2011 03:36 PM, Anton Vorontsov wrote: > > > > No different at all, I'm fine with either power_supply.scope or any > > other flag. :-) > > So are you happy to pull that branch, or did you have some other > concerns with it? I'm OK w/ the idea itself, but to actually pull that branch, the issue w/ needless patching of battery drivers has to be fixed (i.e. drop the changes in the drivers/acpi/). Thanks, -- Anton Vorontsov Email: cbouatmailru@gmail.com