linux-input.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
To: Chase Douglas <chase.douglas@canonical.com>
Cc: Henrik Rydberg <rydberg@euromail.se>,
	Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@gmail.com>,
	linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Input: evdev - Add EVIOC mechanism to extract the MT slot state
Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2012 12:03:33 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120106200332.GC23619@core.coreip.homeip.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F074CAE.7010205@canonical.com>

On Fri, Jan 06, 2012 at 11:34:06AM -0800, Chase Douglas wrote:
> On 01/06/2012 11:18 AM, Henrik Rydberg wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 06, 2012 at 07:55:44PM +0100, Henrik Rydberg wrote:
> >>> 2 different processes should be fine; the problem would be if 2 threads
> >>> of the same process share the same file descriptor. So far the rest of
> >>> evdev copes just fine with multiple threads using the same fd (all
> >>> operations are atomic in this regard), setting ABS_MT_SLOT before
> >>> fetching the state break this property.
> >>
> >> Are we talking about the need for a per-client mutex, or something
> >> more subtle, like introducing indirect coupling between threads
> >> through per-client states? The former ought to be easily remedied.
> > 
> > Ok, maybe not to so easy after all, which probably answers my own
> > question. Looks like a EVIOCGMTSLOT, taking both slot and event code
> > as argument, would be the cleaner route to take. Another ioctl, how do we
> > feel about that?
> 
> What's the problem with userspace locking?

It relies on userspace? ;)

-- 
Dmitry

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-01-06 20:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-01-06 15:16 [PATCH v2] Input: evdev - Add EVIOC mechanism to extract the MT slot state Henrik Rydberg
2012-01-06 16:25 ` Chase Douglas
2012-01-06 18:00 ` Benjamin Tissoires
2012-01-06 18:18   ` Dmitry Torokhov
2012-01-06 18:55     ` Henrik Rydberg
2012-01-06 19:18       ` Henrik Rydberg
2012-01-06 19:34         ` Chase Douglas
2012-01-06 19:48           ` Henrik Rydberg
2012-01-06 20:02             ` Dmitry Torokhov
2012-01-06 20:14               ` Henrik Rydberg
2012-01-06 20:23                 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2012-01-06 20:30                   ` Henrik Rydberg
2012-01-06 20:03           ` Dmitry Torokhov [this message]
2012-01-06 18:56     ` Chase Douglas
2012-01-06 19:58       ` Dmitry Torokhov
2012-01-06 20:09         ` Chase Douglas
2012-01-06 20:17           ` Dmitry Torokhov
2012-01-06 20:44             ` Chase Douglas
2012-01-06 18:45   ` Henrik Rydberg

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120106200332.GC23619@core.coreip.homeip.net \
    --to=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
    --cc=benjamin.tissoires@gmail.com \
    --cc=chase.douglas@canonical.com \
    --cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rydberg@euromail.se \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).