From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Cc: "Arve Hjønnevåg" <arve@android.com>,
linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
"Dmitry Torokhov" <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>,
"Matthew Garrett" <mjg@redhat.com>,
"Chase Douglas" <chase.douglas@canonical.com>,
"Mark Brown" <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Input: Add ioctl to block suspend while event queue is not empty.
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2012 00:30:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201202160030.26503.rjw@sisk.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120214142540.04de41df@notabene.brown>
On Tuesday, February 14, 2012, NeilBrown wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Jan 2012 18:24:16 -0800 Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@android.com> wrote:
>
> > Add an ioctl, EVIOCSSUSPENDBLOCK, to block suspend while the event
> > queue is not empty. This allows userspace code to process input
> > events while the device appears to be asleep.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@android.com>
>
> This is exactly the sort of "feature creep" that I worried about in my reply
> to Rafael's recent "autosleep" patches.
>
> A particular issue here: This patch allows any process that can open an
> input device to keep the device awake - by not reading an event that has
> arrived (whether due to incompetence or malice).
>
> So either we would need strict controls on who can open /dev/input/eventX,
> or be happy that any process can disable suspend.
> Or add some extra feature-creep to provide access control.
I actually think the approach almost correct, because if there are any events
coming from a wakeup device and there is any user space client interested in
them, the kernel should really stay awake until those events are removed from
the client's queue.
So, if they are not read, either we drop them entirely, or we don't suspend
_automatically_.
The problem I have with the $subject patch is that it doesn't check if the
device is a wakeup one and it adds ioctls allowing user space to use the event
queue of a non-wakeup device as a "wakeup source".
> (or just keep this stuff out of the kernel and let a user-space daemon make
> those decisions).
Which is never going to really work, IMHO.
Realistically, do you know of any distro, vendor, whoever, who tried to
actually do that in a released product (or even in a release candidate,
or milestone, or whatever different from a prototype running only on one's
personal desktop)? I don't.
Thanks,
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-15 23:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-01-21 2:24 [PATCH] Input: Add ioctl to block suspend while event queue is not empty Arve Hjønnevåg
2012-02-11 23:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-02-13 23:52 ` Arve Hjønnevåg
2012-02-15 23:51 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-02-16 5:24 ` Arve Hjønnevåg
2012-02-16 22:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-02-16 22:33 ` Mark Brown
2012-02-14 3:25 ` NeilBrown
2012-02-15 23:30 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2012-02-16 1:53 ` Paul Fox
2012-02-16 21:44 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-02-15 23:18 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201202160030.26503.rjw@sisk.pl \
--to=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=arve@android.com \
--cc=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--cc=chase.douglas@canonical.com \
--cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mjg@redhat.com \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).