From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andreas =?iso-8859-1?Q?H=FCbner?= Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] HID: new driver for non-compliant Saitek devices Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2012 13:20:31 +0100 Message-ID: <20120222122028.GA1634@tapura> References: <1329873006-29473-1-git-send-email-andreas@k4n.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="yrj/dFKFPuw6o+aM" Return-path: Received: from v36691.1blu.de ([89.202.1.191]:33874 "EHLO v36691.1blu.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751845Ab2BVMU3 (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Feb 2012 07:20:29 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-input-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-input@vger.kernel.org To: Jiri Kosina Cc: linux-input@vger.kernel.org --yrj/dFKFPuw6o+aM Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Looking through the patch again this morning, I noticed I made a mistake in hid-ids.h. (copy'n'paste error, maybe it was a bit too late yesterday) How do you want me to handle this? Resubmit the original patch? Andreas --yrj/dFKFPuw6o+aM Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="saitek.patch" diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-ids.h b/drivers/hid/hid-ids.h index dc3dee5..9d18ec0 100644 --- a/drivers/hid/hid-ids.h +++ b/drivers/hid/hid-ids.h @@ -613,7 +613,7 @@ #define USB_VENDOR_ID_SAITEK 0x06a3 #define USB_DEVICE_ID_SAITEK_RUMBLEPAD 0xff17 -#define USB_DEVICE_ID_SAITEK_PS1000 0xff17 +#define USB_DEVICE_ID_SAITEK_PS1000 0x0621 #define USB_VENDOR_ID_SAMSUNG 0x0419 #define USB_DEVICE_ID_SAMSUNG_IR_REMOTE 0x0001 --yrj/dFKFPuw6o+aM--