From: "Henrik Rydberg" <rydberg@euromail.se>
To: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Cc: Daniel Kurtz <djkurtz@chromium.org>,
Chung-yih Wang <cywang@chromium.org>,
Alessandro Rubini <rubini@ipvvis.unipv.it>,
linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] CHROMIUM: Input: synaptics - filter out the events with low z values
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 10:23:51 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120224092351.GA2203@polaris.bitmath.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120224091602.GE10763@core.coreip.homeip.net>
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 01:16:02AM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 01:14:52AM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 10:08:35AM +0100, Henrik Rydberg wrote:
> > > > > The most striking effect is the ability to better retain a
> > > > > drag. Although the statement was made in light of possible
> > > > > (1-strong,1-weak) packets, it should help in the 2-weak case too.
> > > >
> > > > The bigger question is why is this needed in kernel. The original
> > > > hysteresis with BTN_TOUCH was done for sole benefit of mousedev so that
> > > > we could allow somewhat better transition from standard PS/2 mode into
> > > > native Synaptics mode with absolute coordinates at time when barely
> > > > anyone had Synaptics X driver installed. This was, what, 10 years ago?
> > >
> > > The semi-mt behavior is obviously a special case, where userspace
> > > relies on the reported number of fingers to transition between one
> > > touch and two touches. There is no pressure information sent to
> > > userspace in this case, so the situation is in fact quite similar to
> > > the ancient mousedev situation.
> >
> > We still report ABS_PRESSURE but maybe we should report ABS_MT_PRESSURE
> > as well?
>
> BTW, the reason I do not like this in kernel is because it dos not allow
> users control touchpad sensitivity.
...which is perfectly reasonable, I agree. OTOH, the semi-mt devices
tend to report close-to-bogus information for anything related to
individual touches. Pressure is sadly no different, as Daniel pointed
out. I don't know what is the lesser evil here.
Henrik
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-24 9:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-22 7:41 [PATCH] CHROMIUM: Input: synaptics - filter out the events with low z values Chung-yih Wang
2012-02-22 8:38 ` Henrik Rydberg
2012-02-22 10:26 ` Daniel Kurtz
2012-02-22 11:04 ` Henrik Rydberg
2012-02-22 13:12 ` Daniel Kurtz
2012-02-22 15:24 ` Henrik Rydberg
2012-02-24 8:27 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2012-02-24 9:08 ` Henrik Rydberg
2012-02-24 9:14 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2012-02-24 9:16 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2012-02-24 9:23 ` Henrik Rydberg [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-02-21 15:07 Chung-yih Wang
2012-02-21 16:35 ` Daniel Kurtz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120224092351.GA2203@polaris.bitmath.org \
--to=rydberg@euromail.se \
--cc=cywang@chromium.org \
--cc=djkurtz@chromium.org \
--cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rubini@ipvvis.unipv.it \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).