From: David Jander <david.jander@protonic.nl>
To: Ben Dooks <ben@trinity.fluff.org>
Cc: "Dmitry Torokhov" <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>,
"David Jander" <david@protonic.nl>,
"Grant Likely" <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>,
linux-input@vger.kernel.org,
"Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] Input: gpio_keys.c: Enable use with non-local GPIO chips.
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2012 12:08:03 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120316120803.13b2fcc2@archvile> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120316101815.GE32060@trinity.fluff.org>
On Fri, 16 Mar 2012 10:18:15 +0000
Ben Dooks <ben@trinity.fluff.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 12:20:04AM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > Hi David,
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 11:08:11AM +0200, David Jander wrote:
> > > Use a threaded interrupt handler in order to permit the handler to use
> > > a GPIO driver that causes things like I2C transactions being done inside
> > > the handler context.
> > > Also, gpio_keys_init needs to be declared as a late_initcall, to make sure
> > > all needed GPIO drivers have been loaded if the drivers are built into the
> > > kernel.
> >
> > Don't want to resurrect the whole initcall discussion, but could you
> > tell me again why the interrup handler needs to be threaded? We do not
> > access hardware from it, hardware is accessed from workqueue context.
> > Here is the ISR in its entirety:
> >
> > static irqreturn_t gpio_keys_isr(int irq, void *dev_id)
> > {
> > struct gpio_button_data *bdata = dev_id;
> > const struct gpio_keys_button *button = bdata->button;
> >
> > BUG_ON(irq != gpio_to_irq(button->gpio));
>
> Why on earth do we need this? this looks like something that is not
> necessary and in my view a waste of cpu cycles.
No idea... catch some weird (hardware-/setup-)bug? Not _that_ many CPU cycles
anyway, plus I am not the author of that line.... maybe ask Uwe Kleine-König
(CC'd)?
> > if (bdata->timer_debounce)
> > mod_timer(&bdata->timer,
> > jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(bdata->timer_debounce));
> > else
> > schedule_work(&bdata->work);
> >
> > return IRQ_HANDLED;
> > }
> >
> > It looks to me that non-threaded handler would work as well? Or
> > gpio_to_irq() can sleep with certain chips?
>
> See above comment, I'd go with just remove it and unthread.
Not unthread, but use request_any_context_irq(), please!
Best regards,
--
David Jander
Protonic Holland.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-16 11:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-14 9:08 [PATCH v4 0/3] Input: gpio_keys.c: Add support for OF and I2C GPIO chips David Jander
2011-06-14 9:08 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] Input: gpio_keys.c: Simplify platform_device -> device casting David Jander
2011-06-16 19:28 ` Grant Likely
2011-06-18 10:19 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-06-20 6:52 ` David Jander
2011-06-20 8:32 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-06-14 9:08 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] Input: gpio_keys.c: Added support for device-tree platform data David Jander
2011-06-16 19:25 ` Grant Likely
2011-06-17 8:58 ` David Jander
2011-06-17 12:54 ` Grant Likely
2011-06-23 8:24 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-06-23 8:55 ` David Jander
2011-06-14 9:08 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] Input: gpio_keys.c: Enable use with non-local GPIO chips David Jander
2011-06-16 19:27 ` Grant Likely
2011-06-18 10:17 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-06-18 13:18 ` Grant Likely
2011-06-18 14:51 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-06-18 15:16 ` Grant Likely
2011-06-20 7:48 ` David Jander
2011-06-20 8:45 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-06-20 9:33 ` David Jander
2011-06-20 18:49 ` Grant Likely
2011-06-20 18:13 ` Grant Likely
2011-06-21 11:46 ` Mark Brown
[not found] ` <BANLkTikjUR_9wq_tGfomLZNdurvmEH1Jxw@mail.gmail.com>
2011-06-21 14:36 ` David Jander
2011-06-21 17:27 ` Mark Brown
2011-06-21 20:48 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-06-21 23:02 ` Mark Brown
2011-06-22 6:11 ` David Jander
2011-06-22 7:00 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-06-22 11:38 ` Mark Brown
2011-06-22 14:58 ` Grant Likely
2011-06-22 21:43 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-06-20 17:03 ` H Hartley Sweeten
2011-06-20 18:20 ` Grant Likely
2011-06-21 6:55 ` David Jander
2011-06-21 7:04 ` Grant Likely
2012-03-16 7:20 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2012-03-16 8:17 ` David Jander
2012-03-16 8:32 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2012-03-16 8:48 ` David Jander
2012-03-16 10:19 ` Ben Dooks
2012-03-16 10:18 ` Ben Dooks
2012-03-16 11:08 ` David Jander [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120316120803.13b2fcc2@archvile \
--to=david.jander@protonic.nl \
--cc=ben@trinity.fluff.org \
--cc=david@protonic.nl \
--cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
--cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).