From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Brown Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] Second patchset for LPC32xx device tree conversion Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 17:56:50 +0100 Message-ID: <20120418165650.GD3099@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> References: <1334682507-15055-1-git-send-email-stigge@antcom.de> <201204180806.16848.arnd@arndb.de> <20120418093604.GL6498@mwanda> <201204181100.40123.arnd@arndb.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="IMjqdzrDRly81ofr" Return-path: Received: from opensource.wolfsonmicro.com ([80.75.67.52]:35272 "EHLO opensource.wolfsonmicro.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751102Ab2DRQ45 (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Apr 2012 12:56:57 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201204181100.40123.arnd@arndb.de> Sender: linux-input-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-input@vger.kernel.org To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: Dan Carpenter , Roland Stigge , devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, srinivas.bakki@nxp.com, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, thierry.reding@avionic-design.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kevin.wells@nxp.com, marek.vasut@gmail.com, arm@kernel.org, linux-input@vger.kernel.org, axel.lin@gmail.com, dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org --IMjqdzrDRly81ofr Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 11:00:39AM +0000, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > 1. develop on -rc > 2. merge with latest -next, test and make sure it works there > 3. submit for review against -rc > 4. have patches included in -next once reviewed, but based on -rc > 5. when merge window opens, have patches sent for upstream inclusion Steps 3 and 4 should be to submit against whatever branch is appropriate for the subsystem and driver - if people follow this process they're going to get bounced back by a fair proportion of maintainers, -rc isn't universally what people are looking for so people should be aware that they need to pay attention here. =20 Generally I'd say the development version is a safer bet than -rc for most subsystems. --IMjqdzrDRly81ofr Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJPjvJLAAoJEBus8iNuMP3d82kP/3+7MODQeuhg0EvXB9a6qZun KLFE8W1nBcva8Y5Zum80CWldALRvrkJfuW6dtzeFm1wBdLm9j2J18csBOe1ITFn1 ZWIcb1vpz58MjFUoVfVGHchK5o+KGvZzDDef5PHv+mWIlc4Sv8fIbXFphG7XlVBP AFFmmVue+ha+YTV1/yQdWwq/mhJB4kg4ypXNDt3QB/qZIc5kLzPwpJwnAHbucPXJ /xGvZ/Df2hJMDw8jMGujTIp23Xtjl8Bd+zbNIGkxhDUBCbLW6GBVButE9LsNP9db s0VWjOtoSoSlz25MvqBTw01X6zld5cjPgJvgUn64BHF3noaNdaeqOP2cUThKSRvY GVr71jX1CSrOG2sjVonOMrSYEKmJJeYzD2lQIopLYC27JiWlxyxq2zvmMKWyYJdJ /GQKe2IdyIOmign2o7Gtt2QhhjZf0Fqx8z7/f5VIOFwxeTwtmLeyvfWrflMMIZ77 7JdEisuWbtALQkhUeO0lg32gSyMG9dwcUzKMsg7Mnh4ejyrh3xZ79C+PRd7ijvJa FhcOi0EIlEPgQLshEzRh7b/mZfL6rtBbH4FmAWp+RyTNfpGiyI3GHhve/Nk3xe+V ADH9+YE5THd/qyhL24SngidzzJXTOWXtPMKRzFhPJz/yqNo2tUEBwvpBcZaoZ75v SKlQT2MLqZJy70WWuyEb =rx+r -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --IMjqdzrDRly81ofr--