linux-input.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
To: George Spelvin <linux@horizon.com>
Cc: linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [REPOST #3 PATCH v2] Input: atkbd - make repeat period more accurate.
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2012 00:39:40 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120725073940.GB15997@core.coreip.homeip.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120722034228.14345.qmail@science.horizon.com>

Hi George,

On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 11:42:28PM -0400, George Spelvin wrote:
> This replaces some inaccurate lookup tables with an exact
> computation.  Although the diff adds source comments,
> it shrinks binary size.  (By only 50 bytes, but hey.)
> 
> AT keyboard repeat rates are multiples of 1/240 second
> expressed in a 0.2.3 bit floating point format.  That
> is, possible values are ({8..15} << {0..3}) / 240 s.

OK.

> 
> In addition to a slightly inaccurate lookup table, the
> old code would round up to the next repeat period.
> E.g. to get a period of 9/60 = 0.15 seconds, you had to
> ask for no more than 149 ms; if you asked for 150, it
> would round up to 167.

This works as intended - it was designed to never have faster than
requested.

>  The new code rounds to nearest.
> 
> User-visible changes to the repeat periods reported by EVIOCGREP:
> 
> Old	 37	109	116	149	182	232
> Exact	 37.50	108.33	116.66	150.00	183.33	233.33
> New	 38	108	117	150	183	233
> 
> Old	270	303	370	435	470
> Exact	266.66	300.00	366.66	433.33	466.66
> New	267	300	367	433	467
> 
> This does not bother utilities like kbdrate(8).
> 
> Signed-off-by: George Spelvin <linux@horizon.com>

I am sorry but I have to ask - is this your real name?

> ---
>  drivers/input/keyboard/atkbd.c |   47 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
>  1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> 
> Now that 3.5 is out, I'm posting this for a FOURTH time,
> hoping for some comments of any sort.
> 
> 
> Now that I've tweaked it (v1 had an error in rounding near exponent
> range boundaries), I think it's ready for merging upstream.
> 
> 
> One possible bug I observed in the code that calls this:
> 
> Users of the KDKBDREP ioctl seem to assume that it returns the actual
> values set, but I'm not sure it really works that way; I don't think
> the command to change the parameters makes its way through the event
> queue and atkbd's schedule_delayed_work() to actually set dev->rep[]
> to the rounded values before kbd_rate_helper returns them to userspace.
> 
> If desired, the fix that's most obvious to me would be to split this
> function in two: perform the conversion to a command byte synchronously,
> and only defer the actual ps2_command().

Yes, I agree, this is a problem.

Thanks.

-- 
Dmitry

  reply	other threads:[~2012-07-25  7:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-07-01  8:36 Subject: [PATCH v2] Input: atkbd - make repeat period more accurate George Spelvin
2012-07-14 11:01 ` [REPOST #2 PATCH " George Spelvin
2012-07-22  3:42   ` [REPOST #3 " George Spelvin
2012-07-25  7:39     ` Dmitry Torokhov [this message]
2012-07-26 15:15       ` George Spelvin
2012-07-30  6:11         ` Dmitry Torokhov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120725073940.GB15997@core.coreip.homeip.net \
    --to=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@horizon.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).