linux-input.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [patch 2/2] HID: sensors: remove some unneeded checks
@ 2012-09-14  6:53 Dan Carpenter
  2012-09-17 10:59 ` Jiri Kosina
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Dan Carpenter @ 2012-09-14  6:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: srinivas pandruvada; +Cc: Jiri Kosina, linux-input, kernel-janitors

"report_id" is unsigned so it's never less than zero.  These checks can
be removed without any problem.

Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>

diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-sensor-hub.c b/drivers/hid/hid-sensor-hub.c
index 0c93b10..22ec3c6 100644
--- a/drivers/hid/hid-sensor-hub.c
+++ b/drivers/hid/hid-sensor-hub.c
@@ -214,9 +214,6 @@ int sensor_hub_set_feature(struct hid_sensor_hub_device *hsdev, u32 report_id,
 	struct sensor_hub_data *data =  hid_get_drvdata(hsdev->hdev);
 	int ret = 0;
 
-	if (report_id < 0)
-		return -EINVAL;
-
 	mutex_lock(&data->mutex);
 	report = sensor_hub_report(report_id, hsdev->hdev, HID_FEATURE_REPORT);
 	if (!report || (field_index >=  report->maxfield)) {
@@ -241,9 +238,6 @@ int sensor_hub_get_feature(struct hid_sensor_hub_device *hsdev, u32 report_id,
 	struct sensor_hub_data *data =  hid_get_drvdata(hsdev->hdev);
 	int ret = 0;
 
-	if (report_id < 0)
-		return -EINVAL;
-
 	mutex_lock(&data->mutex);
 	report = sensor_hub_report(report_id, hsdev->hdev, HID_FEATURE_REPORT);
 	if (!report || (field_index >=  report->maxfield)) {
@@ -271,9 +265,6 @@ int sensor_hub_input_attr_get_raw_value(struct hid_sensor_hub_device *hsdev,
 	struct hid_report *report;
 	int ret_val = 0;
 
-	if (report_id < 0)
-		return -EINVAL;
-
 	mutex_lock(&data->mutex);
 	memset(&data->pending, 0, sizeof(data->pending));
 	init_completion(&data->pending.ready);

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [patch 2/2] HID: sensors: remove some unneeded checks
  2012-09-14  6:53 [patch 2/2] HID: sensors: remove some unneeded checks Dan Carpenter
@ 2012-09-17 10:59 ` Jiri Kosina
  2012-09-17 15:21   ` Pandruvada, Srinivas
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jiri Kosina @ 2012-09-17 10:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Dan Carpenter
  Cc: srinivas pandruvada, linux-input, kernel-janitors,
	Jonathan Cameron

On Fri, 14 Sep 2012, Dan Carpenter wrote:

> "report_id" is unsigned so it's never less than zero.  These checks can
> be removed without any problem.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>

Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>

Adding Jonathan to CC as well. Thanks.

> 
> diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-sensor-hub.c b/drivers/hid/hid-sensor-hub.c
> index 0c93b10..22ec3c6 100644
> --- a/drivers/hid/hid-sensor-hub.c
> +++ b/drivers/hid/hid-sensor-hub.c
> @@ -214,9 +214,6 @@ int sensor_hub_set_feature(struct hid_sensor_hub_device *hsdev, u32 report_id,
>  	struct sensor_hub_data *data =  hid_get_drvdata(hsdev->hdev);
>  	int ret = 0;
>  
> -	if (report_id < 0)
> -		return -EINVAL;
> -
>  	mutex_lock(&data->mutex);
>  	report = sensor_hub_report(report_id, hsdev->hdev, HID_FEATURE_REPORT);
>  	if (!report || (field_index >=  report->maxfield)) {
> @@ -241,9 +238,6 @@ int sensor_hub_get_feature(struct hid_sensor_hub_device *hsdev, u32 report_id,
>  	struct sensor_hub_data *data =  hid_get_drvdata(hsdev->hdev);
>  	int ret = 0;
>  
> -	if (report_id < 0)
> -		return -EINVAL;
> -
>  	mutex_lock(&data->mutex);
>  	report = sensor_hub_report(report_id, hsdev->hdev, HID_FEATURE_REPORT);
>  	if (!report || (field_index >=  report->maxfield)) {
> @@ -271,9 +265,6 @@ int sensor_hub_input_attr_get_raw_value(struct hid_sensor_hub_device *hsdev,
>  	struct hid_report *report;
>  	int ret_val = 0;
>  
> -	if (report_id < 0)
> -		return -EINVAL;
> -
>  	mutex_lock(&data->mutex);
>  	memset(&data->pending, 0, sizeof(data->pending));
>  	init_completion(&data->pending.ready);
> 

-- 
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* RE: [patch 2/2] HID: sensors: remove some unneeded checks
  2012-09-17 10:59 ` Jiri Kosina
@ 2012-09-17 15:21   ` Pandruvada, Srinivas
  2012-09-18 20:52     ` Jonathan Cameron
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Pandruvada, Srinivas @ 2012-09-17 15:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jiri Kosina, Dan Carpenter
  Cc: linux-input@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org,
	Jonathan Cameron

Tested this and it works.

-----Original Message-----
From: Jiri Kosina [mailto:jkosina@suse.cz] 
Sent: Monday, September 17, 2012 4:00 AM
To: Dan Carpenter
Cc: Pandruvada, Srinivas; linux-input@vger.kernel.org; kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org; Jonathan Cameron
Subject: Re: [patch 2/2] HID: sensors: remove some unneeded checks

On Fri, 14 Sep 2012, Dan Carpenter wrote:

> "report_id" is unsigned so it's never less than zero.  These checks 
> can be removed without any problem.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>

Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>

Adding Jonathan to CC as well. Thanks.

> 
> diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-sensor-hub.c 
> b/drivers/hid/hid-sensor-hub.c index 0c93b10..22ec3c6 100644
> --- a/drivers/hid/hid-sensor-hub.c
> +++ b/drivers/hid/hid-sensor-hub.c
> @@ -214,9 +214,6 @@ int sensor_hub_set_feature(struct hid_sensor_hub_device *hsdev, u32 report_id,
>  	struct sensor_hub_data *data =  hid_get_drvdata(hsdev->hdev);
>  	int ret = 0;
>  
> -	if (report_id < 0)
> -		return -EINVAL;
> -
>  	mutex_lock(&data->mutex);
>  	report = sensor_hub_report(report_id, hsdev->hdev, HID_FEATURE_REPORT);
>  	if (!report || (field_index >=  report->maxfield)) { @@ -241,9 
> +238,6 @@ int sensor_hub_get_feature(struct hid_sensor_hub_device *hsdev, u32 report_id,
>  	struct sensor_hub_data *data =  hid_get_drvdata(hsdev->hdev);
>  	int ret = 0;
>  
> -	if (report_id < 0)
> -		return -EINVAL;
> -
>  	mutex_lock(&data->mutex);
>  	report = sensor_hub_report(report_id, hsdev->hdev, HID_FEATURE_REPORT);
>  	if (!report || (field_index >=  report->maxfield)) { @@ -271,9 
> +265,6 @@ int sensor_hub_input_attr_get_raw_value(struct hid_sensor_hub_device *hsdev,
>  	struct hid_report *report;
>  	int ret_val = 0;
>  
> -	if (report_id < 0)
> -		return -EINVAL;
> -
>  	mutex_lock(&data->mutex);
>  	memset(&data->pending, 0, sizeof(data->pending));
>  	init_completion(&data->pending.ready);
> 

--
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [patch 2/2] HID: sensors: remove some unneeded checks
  2012-09-17 15:21   ` Pandruvada, Srinivas
@ 2012-09-18 20:52     ` Jonathan Cameron
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jonathan Cameron @ 2012-09-18 20:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Pandruvada, Srinivas
  Cc: Jiri Kosina, Dan Carpenter, linux-input@vger.kernel.org,
	kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org

I've add these both to the togreg branch of

git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jic23/iio.git

Will send onwards in a few days.

> Tested this and it works.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jiri Kosina [mailto:jkosina@suse.cz] 
> Sent: Monday, September 17, 2012 4:00 AM
> To: Dan Carpenter
> Cc: Pandruvada, Srinivas; linux-input@vger.kernel.org; kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org; Jonathan Cameron
> Subject: Re: [patch 2/2] HID: sensors: remove some unneeded checks
> 
> On Fri, 14 Sep 2012, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> 
>> "report_id" is unsigned so it's never less than zero.  These checks 
>> can be removed without any problem.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
> 
> Adding Jonathan to CC as well. Thanks.
> 
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-sensor-hub.c 
>> b/drivers/hid/hid-sensor-hub.c index 0c93b10..22ec3c6 100644
>> --- a/drivers/hid/hid-sensor-hub.c
>> +++ b/drivers/hid/hid-sensor-hub.c
>> @@ -214,9 +214,6 @@ int sensor_hub_set_feature(struct hid_sensor_hub_device *hsdev, u32 report_id,
>>  	struct sensor_hub_data *data =  hid_get_drvdata(hsdev->hdev);
>>  	int ret = 0;
>>  
>> -	if (report_id < 0)
>> -		return -EINVAL;
>> -
>>  	mutex_lock(&data->mutex);
>>  	report = sensor_hub_report(report_id, hsdev->hdev, HID_FEATURE_REPORT);
>>  	if (!report || (field_index >=  report->maxfield)) { @@ -241,9 
>> +238,6 @@ int sensor_hub_get_feature(struct hid_sensor_hub_device *hsdev, u32 report_id,
>>  	struct sensor_hub_data *data =  hid_get_drvdata(hsdev->hdev);
>>  	int ret = 0;
>>  
>> -	if (report_id < 0)
>> -		return -EINVAL;
>> -
>>  	mutex_lock(&data->mutex);
>>  	report = sensor_hub_report(report_id, hsdev->hdev, HID_FEATURE_REPORT);
>>  	if (!report || (field_index >=  report->maxfield)) { @@ -271,9 
>> +265,6 @@ int sensor_hub_input_attr_get_raw_value(struct hid_sensor_hub_device *hsdev,
>>  	struct hid_report *report;
>>  	int ret_val = 0;
>>  
>> -	if (report_id < 0)
>> -		return -EINVAL;
>> -
>>  	mutex_lock(&data->mutex);
>>  	memset(&data->pending, 0, sizeof(data->pending));
>>  	init_completion(&data->pending.ready);
>>
> 
> --
> Jiri Kosina
> SUSE Labs
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2012-09-18 20:52 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-09-14  6:53 [patch 2/2] HID: sensors: remove some unneeded checks Dan Carpenter
2012-09-17 10:59 ` Jiri Kosina
2012-09-17 15:21   ` Pandruvada, Srinivas
2012-09-18 20:52     ` Jonathan Cameron

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).