From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 01/06] input/rmi4: Public header and documentation
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2012 14:16:00 +0900
Message-ID: <20121012051558.GK11726@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
References: <1349496603-20775-1-git-send-email-cheiny@synaptics.com>
 <1349496603-20775-2-git-send-email-cheiny@synaptics.com>
 <CACRpkdZb+LOk8v0aNZuPhATjS5jv-h1JJCejoh_9eFZ_fdiZQA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20121009082719.GC8237@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
 <BFABBC009FBA1C43B207B15FD485ABD922C22BE7@USW-MAIL1.synaptics-inc.local>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <linux-input-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from opensource.wolfsonmicro.com ([80.75.67.52]:36985 "EHLO
	opensource.wolfsonmicro.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK)
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754362Ab2JLFQM (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-input@vger.kernel.org>);
	Fri, 12 Oct 2012 01:16:12 -0400
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <BFABBC009FBA1C43B207B15FD485ABD922C22BE7@USW-MAIL1.synaptics-inc.local>
Sender: linux-input-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-input@vger.kernel.org
To: Christopher Heiny <Cheiny@synaptics.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>, Anton Vorontsov <anton.vorontsov@linaro.org>, Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>, Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>, Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Linux Input <linux-input@vger.kernel.org>, Allie Xiong <axiong@synaptics.com>, Vivian Ly <vly@synaptics.com>, Daniel Rosenberg <daniel.rosenberg@synaptics.com>, Joerie de Gram <j.de.gram@gmail.com>, Wolfram Sang <w.sang@pengutronix.de>, Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@stericsson.com>, Naveen Kumar Gaddipati <naveen.gaddipati@stericsson.com>, Alexandra Chin <alexandra.chin@tw.synaptics.com>

On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 03:56:22AM +0000, Christopher Heiny wrote:

Fix your mailer to word wrap within paragraphs.

> If this feature is a deal-breaker, we can take it out.  In the absence
> of a generic GPIO implementation for CS, though, I'd much rather leave
> it in.  Once generic GPIO CS arrives, we'll remove it pretty quickly.  

Why not just implement this at an appropriate level in the SPI
subsystem?  One of the great things about Linux is that you can change
the core code...