From: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>,
linux-input@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 17/25] wm97xx: don't use [delayed_]work_pending()
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2013 18:49:13 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130312184912.GQ19942@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130309235336.GA22734@core.coreip.homeip.net>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 655 bytes --]
On Sat, Mar 09, 2013 at 03:53:36PM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 04:18:27PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> > I'm a bit nervous about the fact that currently both the pen down IRQ
> > and the coordinate read are pushed through a single workqueue so are
> > serialised but after your patch they'll be split into the IRQ thread and
> > the workqueue. It *should* be fine but I'd have to sit there and study
> > it to convince myself that it's safe.
> Mark,
> Did yo have a chance to review the patch?
> Thanks!
Sort of. I'd be much happier keeping them serialised, it's too much
work on legacy code to convince myself otherwise.
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-12 18:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1356141435-17340-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org>
2012-12-22 1:57 ` [PATCH 17/25] wm97xx: don't use [delayed_]work_pending() Tejun Heo
2012-12-23 9:54 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2012-12-24 16:18 ` Mark Brown
2013-03-09 23:53 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2013-03-12 18:49 ` Mark Brown [this message]
2012-12-24 18:25 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130312184912.GQ19942@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--to=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lrg@slimlogic.co.uk \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).