* [PATCH] elantech: fix for newer hardware versions (v7)
@ 2013-07-05 22:18 Matteo Delfino
2013-07-06 4:30 ` Dmitry Torokhov
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Matteo Delfino @ 2013-07-05 22:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-input; +Cc: Alessandro Rubini, Dmitry Torokhov
* Fix version recognition in elantech_set_properties
The new hardware reports itself as v7 but the packets'
structure is unaltered.
* Fix packet type recognition in elantech_packet_check_v4
The bitmask used for v6 is too wide, only the last three bits of
the third byte in a packet (packet[3] & 0x03) are actually used to
distinguish between packet types.
Starting from v7, additional information (to be interpreted) is
stored in the remaining bits (packets[3] & 0x1c).
In addition, the value stored in (packet[0] & 0x0c) is no longer
a constant but contains additional information yet to be deciphered.
This change should be backwards compatible with v6 hardware.
Additional-author: Giovanni Frigione <gio.frigione@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Matteo Delfino <kendatsuba@gmail.com>
---
drivers/input/mouse/elantech.c | 11 +++++------
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/input/mouse/elantech.c b/drivers/input/mouse/elantech.c
index e2a9867..4d54773 100644
--- a/drivers/input/mouse/elantech.c
+++ b/drivers/input/mouse/elantech.c
@@ -677,17 +677,15 @@ static int elantech_packet_check_v3(struct psmouse
*psmouse)
static int elantech_packet_check_v4(struct psmouse *psmouse)
{
unsigned char *packet = psmouse->packet;
+ unsigned char packet_type = packet[3] & 0x03;
- if ((packet[0] & 0x0c) == 0x04 &&
- (packet[3] & 0x1f) == 0x11)
+ if (packet_type == 0x01)
return PACKET_V4_HEAD;
- if ((packet[0] & 0x0c) == 0x04 &&
- (packet[3] & 0x1f) == 0x12)
+ if (packet_type == 0x02)
return PACKET_V4_MOTION;
- if ((packet[0] & 0x0c) == 0x04 &&
- (packet[3] & 0x1f) == 0x10)
+ if (packet_type == 0x00)
return PACKET_V4_STATUS;
return PACKET_UNKNOWN;
@@ -1226,6 +1224,7 @@ static int elantech_set_properties(struct
elantech_data *etd)
etd->hw_version = 3;
break;
case 6:
+ case 7:
etd->hw_version = 4;
break;
default:
--
1.7.10.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] elantech: fix for newer hardware versions (v7)
2013-07-05 22:18 [PATCH] elantech: fix for newer hardware versions (v7) Matteo Delfino
@ 2013-07-06 4:30 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2013-07-06 7:20 ` Matteo Delfino
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Dmitry Torokhov @ 2013-07-06 4:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Matteo Delfino; +Cc: linux-input, Alessandro Rubini
Hi Matteo,
On Sat, Jul 06, 2013 at 12:18:32AM +0200, Matteo Delfino wrote:
> * Fix version recognition in elantech_set_properties
>
> The new hardware reports itself as v7 but the packets'
> structure is unaltered.
>
> * Fix packet type recognition in elantech_packet_check_v4
>
> The bitmask used for v6 is too wide, only the last three bits of
> the third byte in a packet (packet[3] & 0x03) are actually used to
> distinguish between packet types.
> Starting from v7, additional information (to be interpreted) is
> stored in the remaining bits (packets[3] & 0x1c).
> In addition, the value stored in (packet[0] & 0x0c) is no longer
> a constant but contains additional information yet to be deciphered.
> This change should be backwards compatible with v6 hardware.
>
> Additional-author: Giovanni Frigione <gio.frigione@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Matteo Delfino <kendatsuba@gmail.com>
Thank you for the patch, unfortunately your mailer line-wrapped it and
it can't be applied. Could you please resend it using MUA that does not
perform line-wrapping?
Also, now that you only use (packet[3] & 0x03) to determine packet type,
could you turn series of 'if' statements in elantech_packet_check_v4()
into a 'switch'?
Thanks!
--
Dmitry
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] elantech: fix for newer hardware versions (v7)
2013-07-06 4:30 ` Dmitry Torokhov
@ 2013-07-06 7:20 ` Matteo Delfino
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Matteo Delfino @ 2013-07-06 7:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dmitry Torokhov; +Cc: linux-input, Alessandro Rubini
Hi Dmitry,
On 07/06/2013 06:30 AM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> Thank you for the patch, unfortunately your mailer line-wrapped it and
> it can't be applied. Could you please resend it using MUA that does not
> perform line-wrapping?
>
Of course, sorry about that.
> Also, now that you only use (packet[3] & 0x03) to determine packet type,
> could you turn series of 'if' statements in elantech_packet_check_v4()
> into a 'switch'?
Sure, i will.
Best regards,
Matteo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-07-06 7:20 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-07-05 22:18 [PATCH] elantech: fix for newer hardware versions (v7) Matteo Delfino
2013-07-06 4:30 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2013-07-06 7:20 ` Matteo Delfino
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).