linux-input.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel.garcia@free-electrons.com>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel@vanguardiasur.com.ar>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-input@vger.kernel.org" <linux-input@vger.kernel.org>,
	Daniel Mack <zonque@gmail.com>,
	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>,
	"rob.herring@calxeda.com" <rob.herring@calxeda.com>,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] input: rotary-encoder: Add 'on-each-step' to binding documentation
Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2013 11:09:26 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131004140925.GA27809@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131004131956.GE6999@e106331-lin.cambridge.arm.com>

On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 02:19:56PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 01:53:23PM +0100, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
> > The driver now supports a new mode to handle the interruptions generated
> > by the device: on this new mode an input event is generated on each step
> > (i.e. on each IRQ). Therefore, add a new DT property, to select the
> > mode: 'rotary-encoder,on-each-step'.
> > 
> > Cc: Daniel Mack <zonque@gmail.com>
> > Cc: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
> > Cc: Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>
> > Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org
> > Signed-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel@vanguardiasur.com.ar>
> > ---
> > I'm not at all happy with this DT binding as it's way to customized
> > for the current driver. For instance, if we want to support mapping
> > key events (or better arbitrary linux-input event types) it seems
> > there's no easy way to fix the binding.
> > 
> > Maybe a better way of handling the different 'modes' is through
> > compatible strings?
> 
> I'd prefer not to have more pseudo-devices in DT, and would prefer not
> to have compatible strings that boil down to driver options. We end up
> just embedding a tonne of Linux-specific driver configuration in the DT
> rather than describing hardware.
> 
> That said, I'm not sure what the best solution is here.
> 
> > 
> > I'm not really sure, so I hope the DT guys have some comment on this.
> > 
> >  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/rotary-encoder.txt | 1 +
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/rotary-encoder.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/rotary-encoder.txt
> > index 3315495..b89e38d 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/rotary-encoder.txt
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/rotary-encoder.txt
> > @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ Optional properties:
> >  - rotary-encoder,rollover: Automatic rollove when the rotary value becomes
> >    greater than the specified steps or smaller than 0. For absolute axis only.
> >  - rotary-encoder,half-period: Makes the driver work on half-period mode.
> > +- rotary-encoder,on-each-step: Makes the driver send an event on each step.
> 
> Could this not be something requested at runtime?
> 

Sure. The different modes:

* default (no option)
* rotary-encoder,half-period
* rotary-encoder,on-each-step

Just map to different interruption handlers. I don't have any other
rotary-encoder device, so I'm not at all sure what's the use of the
other two cases.
My particular device is detented, and produces a 'stable' event on each
step (i.e on each IRQ).

Regarding the runtime specification: you mean as a module parameter?
That should be trivial to add, no?

> Could you explain what you want to achieve with this? -- what events do
> you want to occur when, to be handled in what way?
> 

Hm.. maybe I should have added the binding to the 1/2 patch and CCed
everybody involved for better context.

Anyway, I hope the above is clearer, I'm not really sure how to specify
the details in the DT binding, since it's a specific interruption handler
for this class of encoder devices (stable on each step).

That said, I really hope I'm crafting a generic solution and not some
tailor-made implementation that just happens to match my use case.

The input maintainer's opinion on this would be valuable.
-- 
Ezequiel García, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android Engineering
http://free-electrons.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

  reply	other threads:[~2013-10-04 14:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-10-04 12:53 [PATCH v2 0/2] rotary-encoder: Add new interruption handler Ezequiel Garcia
2013-10-04 12:53 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] Input: rotary-encoder: Add 'stepped' irq handler Ezequiel Garcia
2013-10-04 13:18   ` Daniel Mack
2013-10-12 16:58     ` Ezequiel García
     [not found] ` <1380891203-17617-1-git-send-email-ezequiel-30ULvvUtt6G51wMPkGsGjgyUoB5FGQPZ@public.gmane.org>
2013-10-04 12:53   ` [PATCH v2 2/2] input: rotary-encoder: Add 'on-each-step' to binding documentation Ezequiel Garcia
2013-10-04 13:19     ` Mark Rutland
2013-10-04 14:09       ` Ezequiel Garcia [this message]
2013-10-10 13:55         ` Ezequiel García

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20131004140925.GA27809@localhost \
    --to=ezequiel.garcia@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
    --cc=ezequiel@vanguardiasur.com.ar \
    --cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=rob.herring@calxeda.com \
    --cc=zonque@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).