Re: [PATCHv2 1/3] Input: twl4030-keypad - add device tree support

[Sebastian Reichel <sre@debian.org>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1672 bytes --]

Hi Pavel,

On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 12:17:15PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > Add device tree support for twl4030 keypad driver and update the
> > Documentation with twl4030 keypad device tree binding information.
> > 
> > Tested on Nokia N900.
> 
> It looks pretty good.

Thanks.

> > + * keypad,num-rows and keypad,num-columns are required.
> Is "keypad," prefix neccessary here?

See Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/matrix-keymap.txt

> > +Optional Properties specific to linux:
> > +- linux,keypad-no-autorepeat: do no enable autorepeat feature.
> 
> "do not autorepeat". Plus I do not see what is Linux specifc about not
> autorepeating... Other systems will likely know about autorepeat, too.

This property has already been used like this for
samsung-keypad, stmpe-keypad, omap-keypad and
gpio-matrix-keypad.

> > +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF)
> I'm probably missing something here, but why not #ifdef CONFIG_OF?

I have been told for other drivers, that IS_ENABLED() is
the prefered way to check for configuration these days.

> > @@ -381,7 +426,7 @@ static int twl4030_kp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >  
> >  	input_set_capability(input, EV_MSC, MSC_SCAN);
> >  	/* Enable auto repeat feature of Linux input subsystem */
> > -	if (pdata->rep)
> > +	if (!kp->no_autorepeat)
> >  		__set_bit(EV_REP, input->evbit);
> >
> 
> Double negation is nasty to read. I believe code would be more
> readable if you switched logic to kp->autorepeat.

I was thinking about the same when writing it, but decided
against it, since it will just move the double negation to
the variable initialization.

-- Sebastian

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]