From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Oberski Subject: changes to ati_remote to support ATI Remote Wonder Plus RF Remote Control Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2013 18:45:25 -0400 Message-ID: <20131101224525.GA17647@OptiPlex-755> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from smtp1.micro-line.net ([76.74.194.3]:32897 "EHLO smtp1.micro-line.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753938Ab3KAWpj (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Nov 2013 18:45:39 -0400 Received: from ccc.cargocult.ca (ccc.cargocult.ca [76.74.195.101]) by smtp1.micro-line.net (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id rA1Mjchs024992 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Fri, 1 Nov 2013 18:45:38 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-input-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-input@vger.kernel.org To: sfo@cargocult.ca Cc: linux-input@vger.kernel.org I've been attempting to send a message to the linux-input list describing proposed changes to the ati_remote.c (drivers/media/rc/ati_remote.c) module that would allow for support of the ATI Remote Wonder Plus RF Remote Control. I've stripped the message down to these few lines to determine if it is the content of the message that is causing it to be rejected. Thanks, -- Stephen Oberski sfo@cargocult.ca