linux-input.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc: linux-input@vger.kernel.org, lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Input: ads7846: Convert to hwmon_device_register_with_groups
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2013 20:08:15 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131128040815.GE15452@core.coreip.homeip.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <529548CD.7060906@roeck-us.net>

On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 05:20:13PM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 11/26/2013 10:58 AM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> >Hi Guenter,
> >
> >On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 08:39:04PM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> >>Simplify the code and create mandatory 'name' attribute by using
> >>new hwmon API.
> >
> >So this moves hwmon attributes from the parent i2c device to the hwmon
> >device, right? Would not that break userspace which expects to find the
> >attributes where they were?
> >
> 
> In addition to Jean's earlier comments ... s/i2c/spi/, I assume. spi devices
> don't create the mandatory name attribute automatically, which means
> that the created hwmon device was not recognized by standard user space
> applications (eg the sensors command or anything else using libsensors)
> in the first place. Which in turn means that only applications which don't
> support the standard hwmon ABI - if there are any - would be affected.
> What we are more concerned about is to make sure that applications
> which _do_ follow the hwmon ABI are working.

OK, fair enough, I'll apply this then.

-- 
Dmitry

      reply	other threads:[~2013-11-28  4:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-11-26  4:39 [PATCH v2] Input: ads7846: Convert to hwmon_device_register_with_groups Guenter Roeck
2013-11-26 18:58 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2013-11-26 19:36   ` [lm-sensors] " Jean Delvare
2013-11-27  1:20   ` Guenter Roeck
2013-11-28  4:08     ` Dmitry Torokhov [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20131128040815.GE15452@core.coreip.homeip.net \
    --to=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
    --cc=lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).