From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Lee Jones Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3 RESEND] mfd: tc3589x: Reform device tree probing Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2014 15:11:23 +0000 Message-ID: <20140123151123.GE8586@lee--X1> References: <1390481008-23900-1-git-send-email-linus.walleij@linaro.org> <20140123133141.GD8586@lee--X1> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from mail-we0-f173.google.com ([74.125.82.173]:50538 "EHLO mail-we0-f173.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753000AbaAWPLa (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Jan 2014 10:11:30 -0500 Received: by mail-we0-f173.google.com with SMTP id t60so1319216wes.32 for ; Thu, 23 Jan 2014 07:11:29 -0800 (PST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-input-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-input@vger.kernel.org To: Linus Walleij Cc: "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , Dmitry Torokhov , Linux Input , Samuel Ortiz , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , Mark Rutland > > Patch looks good to me. Is there any reason why we should rush this= in > > for v3.14, or is it okay to go to -next? >=20 > No rush, but it's been on review like forever so unless there is > some noise from the DT people at -rc1 I'd be very happy if you > could apply patches 1 & 2 by then. I'm just waiting for their Ack. If I don't have it soon I'll review it myself and any changes will have to come in via subsequent patch submissions. I think it's sensible to head for v3.15 for this set. > The third one can be applied out-of-order to the input tree after > that. --=20 Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org =E2=94=82 Open source software for ARM SoCs =46ollow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" = in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html