From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthew Garrett Subject: Re: [PATCH resend 2/2] input/serio/8042: Add firmware_id support Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2014 19:29:26 +0100 Message-ID: <20140409182926.GB3196@srcf.ucam.org> References: <1397033270-29597-1-git-send-email-hdegoede@redhat.com> <1397033270-29597-3-git-send-email-hdegoede@redhat.com> <20140409182434.GA25308@core.coreip.homeip.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from cavan.codon.org.uk ([93.93.128.6]:47790 "EHLO cavan.codon.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933323AbaDIS3b (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Apr 2014 14:29:31 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140409182434.GA25308@core.coreip.homeip.net> Sender: linux-input-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-input@vger.kernel.org To: Dmitry Torokhov Cc: Hans de Goede , Benjamin Tissoires , Peter Hutterer , linux-input@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 11:24:34AM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > Do we need all IDs? I'd expect we only interested in HID, not CIDs? I think HID handles the cases we've seen so far, but we could imagine a system vendor providing their own HID, a trackpad vendor's CID and then the generic mouse CID. It seems better to err on the side of including them. -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org