From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dmitry Torokhov Subject: Re: [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH v6 0/7] mfd: AXP20x: Add support for AXP202 and AXP209 Date: Thu, 22 May 2014 12:55:23 -0700 Message-ID: <20140522195523.GB7708@core.coreip.homeip.net> References: <1400528868-5971-1-git-send-email-carlo@caione.org> <20140520222307.GK12304@sirena.org.uk> <20140521091456.GB6679@lee--X1> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mail-pb0-f51.google.com ([209.85.160.51]:61120 "EHLO mail-pb0-f51.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751430AbaEVTz1 (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 May 2014 15:55:27 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-input-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-input@vger.kernel.org To: Carlo Caione Cc: Lee Jones , Mark Brown , linux-arm-kernel , Maxime Ripard , Hans De Goede , Emilio Lopez , wens Tsai , sameo@linux.intel.com, linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, Liam Girdwood , Boris BREZILLON , linux-sunxi@googlegroups.com On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 09:15:12PM +0200, Carlo Caione wrote: > On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 11:14 AM, Lee Jones wrote: > >> >> This set of patches introduces the core driver and support for two different > >> >> subsystems: > >> >> - Regulators > >> > > >> >> .../ABI/testing/sysfs-driver-input-axp-pek | 11 + > >> >> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/axp20x.txt | 93 +++++++ > >> >> .../devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt | 1 + > >> >> arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig | 3 + > >> >> arch/arm/configs/sunxi_defconfig | 4 + > >> >> drivers/input/misc/Kconfig | 11 + > >> >> drivers/input/misc/Makefile | 1 + > >> >> drivers/input/misc/axp20x-pek.c | 281 +++++++++++++++++++++ > >> >> drivers/mfd/Kconfig | 12 + > >> >> drivers/mfd/Makefile | 1 + > >> >> drivers/mfd/axp20x.c | 258 +++++++++++++++++++ > >> >> include/linux/mfd/axp20x.h | 180 +++++++++++++ > >> >> 12 files changed, 856 insertions(+) > >> > > >> > The regulator changes don't appear to be showing up in the diffstat or > >> > obviously in the series? > >> > >> Right. Cut-and-paste error. > >> You have already applied the regulator patches so I didn't include > >> them here (in theory I posted this series to be picked up by Lee). > > > > That's fine. Just tell me which patches need to stay together and > > which are able to be applied through their respective subsystem trees > > separately. Then, once I have all the Acks I can apply no problem. > > Hi Lee, > I'd say #1 for the MFD tree, #4 for the input subsystem, #2 #3 and #5 > are documentations, #6 and #7 defconfigs add-on. I am fine with the input piece going through MFD tree, no need to split it from the rest. Thanks. -- Dmitry