From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
To: Beomho Seo <beomho.seo@samsung.com>
Cc: linux-input@vger.kernel.org, jy0922.shim@samsung.com,
sachin.kamat@linaro.org, myungjoo.ham@samsung.com,
jh80.chung@samsung.com, cw00.choi@samsung.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] Input: mcs_touchkey: use devm_* functions
Date: Mon, 26 May 2014 13:36:02 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140526203602.GA5484@core.coreip.homeip.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1401110952-25602-2-git-send-email-beomho.seo@samsung.com>
Hi Beomho,
On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 10:29:11PM +0900, Beomho Seo wrote:
> This patch use devm_* funtions in mcs_touchkey driver.
> As a result, error path and remove() funtion is simplified.
>
> Signed-off-by: Beomho Seo <beomho.seo@samsung.com>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - Additionally use devm_kzalloc for mcs_touchkey_data struct.
> ---
> drivers/input/keyboard/mcs_touchkey.c | 53 +++++++++------------------------
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/input/keyboard/mcs_touchkey.c b/drivers/input/keyboard/mcs_touchkey.c
> index 1da8e0b..455bd62 100644
> --- a/drivers/input/keyboard/mcs_touchkey.c
> +++ b/drivers/input/keyboard/mcs_touchkey.c
> @@ -103,7 +103,6 @@ static int mcs_touchkey_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
> struct mcs_touchkey_data *data;
> struct input_dev *input_dev;
> unsigned int fw_reg;
> - int fw_ver;
> int error;
> int i;
>
> @@ -113,14 +112,11 @@ static int mcs_touchkey_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> - data = kzalloc(sizeof(struct mcs_touchkey_data) +
> - sizeof(data->keycodes[0]) * (pdata->key_maxval + 1),
> - GFP_KERNEL);
> - input_dev = input_allocate_device();
> + data = devm_kzalloc(&client->dev, sizeof(*data), GFP_KERNEL);
> + input_dev = devm_input_allocate_device(&client->dev);
> if (!data || !input_dev) {
> dev_err(&client->dev, "Failed to allocate memory\n");
> - error = -ENOMEM;
> - goto err_free_mem;
> + return -ENOMEM;
> }
>
> data->client = client;
> @@ -139,13 +135,12 @@ static int mcs_touchkey_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
> fw_reg = MCS5080_TOUCHKEY_FW;
> }
>
> - fw_ver = i2c_smbus_read_byte_data(client, fw_reg);
> - if (fw_ver < 0) {
> - error = fw_ver;
> + error = i2c_smbus_read_byte_data(client, fw_reg);
You are not reading error code, you are reading firmware version. I am
not sure why you are changing this code.
> + if (error < 0) {
> dev_err(&client->dev, "i2c read error[%d]\n", error);
> - goto err_free_mem;
> - }
> - dev_info(&client->dev, "Firmware version: %d\n", fw_ver);
> + return error;
> + } else
> + dev_info(&client->dev, "Firmware version: %d\n", error);
>
> input_dev->name = "MELPAS MCS Touchkey";
> input_dev->id.bustype = BUS_I2C;
> @@ -176,40 +171,21 @@ static int mcs_touchkey_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
> data->poweron(true);
> }
>
> - error = request_threaded_irq(client->irq, NULL, mcs_touchkey_interrupt,
> - IRQF_TRIGGER_FALLING | IRQF_ONESHOT,
> - client->dev.driver->name, data);
> + error = devm_request_threaded_irq(&client->dev, client->irq, NULL,
> + mcs_touchkey_interrupt, IRQF_TRIGGER_FALLING | IRQF_ONESHOT,
> + dev_name(&client->dev), data);
The original code was attaching driver name to the IRQ, now you are
attaching device name. Why? I am not against it per se, but it needs to
be a separate patch with its own justification.
> if (error) {
> dev_err(&client->dev, "Failed to register interrupt\n");
> - goto err_free_mem;
> + return error;
> }
>
> error = input_register_device(input_dev);
> if (error)
> - goto err_free_irq;
> + dev_err(&client->dev, "Failed to register input device\n");
> + return error;
>
> i2c_set_clientdata(client, data);
> return 0;
> -
> -err_free_irq:
> - free_irq(client->irq, data);
> -err_free_mem:
> - input_free_device(input_dev);
> - kfree(data);
> - return error;
> -}
> -
> -static int mcs_touchkey_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
> -{
> - struct mcs_touchkey_data *data = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
> -
> - free_irq(client->irq, data);
> - if (data->poweron)
> - data->poweron(false);
Why aren't you powering down the chip anymore?
> - input_unregister_device(data->input_dev);
> - kfree(data);
> -
> - return 0;
> }
>
> static void mcs_touchkey_shutdown(struct i2c_client *client)
> @@ -269,7 +245,6 @@ static struct i2c_driver mcs_touchkey_driver = {
> .pm = &mcs_touchkey_pm_ops,
> },
> .probe = mcs_touchkey_probe,
> - .remove = mcs_touchkey_remove,
> .shutdown = mcs_touchkey_shutdown,
> .id_table = mcs_touchkey_id,
> };
> --
> 1.7.9.5
>
Thanks.
--
Dmitry
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-26 20:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-26 13:29 [PATCH v2 0/2] Use devm_* functions for Melfas touch device Beomho Seo
2014-05-26 13:29 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] Input: mcs_touchkey: use devm_* functions Beomho Seo
2014-05-26 20:36 ` Dmitry Torokhov [this message]
2014-05-26 13:29 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] Input: mcs5000_ts: " Beomho Seo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140526203602.GA5484@core.coreip.homeip.net \
--to=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=beomho.seo@samsung.com \
--cc=cw00.choi@samsung.com \
--cc=jh80.chung@samsung.com \
--cc=jy0922.shim@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=myungjoo.ham@samsung.com \
--cc=sachin.kamat@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).