From: Patrik Fimml <patrikf@chromium.org>
To: Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@google.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
Patrik Fimml <patrikf@chromium.org>,
Bastien Nocera <hadess@hadess.net>,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, Benson Leung <bleung@google.com>,
linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Power-managing devices that are not of interest at some point in time
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2014 13:01:14 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140728200114.GB20708@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1451627.FURGiR949u@dtor-glaptop>
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 04:16:50PM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> [...]
> Anyway, even though it is very tempting to declare inhibit a "deeper" state of
> runtime suspend maybe you are right and inhibit should really be separate from
> PM and drivers would have to sort out all the possible state permutations.
>
> Considering input devices:
>
> input_open(): check if device is inhibited, if so do nothing. Otherwise try
> waking up itself and parent (via pm_runtime_get_sync() on itself), this will
> power up the device. Do additional configuration if needed.
>
> input_close(): check if device is inhibited, if not do pm_runtime_put (_sync?
> to make sure we power off properly and not leave device up and running? or
> should we power down manually not waiting for runtime PM)?
>
> inhibit(): check if device is opened, if opened do pm_runtime_put_sync().
>
> uninhibit(): if device is opened do pm_runtime_get_sync(), let runtime PM
> bring up the device. Do additional config if needed -> very similar to
> input_open(), different condition.
>
> runtime_suspend(): power down the device. If not inhibited enable as wakeup
> source.
>
> runtime_resume(): power up the device if device is opened and not inhibited.
>
> system_suspend(): check if device is opened, not inhibited and not in
> runtimesuspend already; power down.
>
> system_resume(): power up the device if it is opened and not inhibited. I
> guess it's OK to wake up device that shoudl be runtime-PM-idle since it will
> go to back sleep shortly.
>
> Ugh.. This is complicated...
There might be more elegant ways to implement this. It might make sense
to factor out power transitions. One could have a function that derives
the appropriate power state given the circumstances (i.e.
suspend/inhibit/runtime suspend) and then performs the needed
transition. This is something one would have to see when actually
implementing this, I might experiment with this approach a bit.
Regards,
Patrik
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-28 20:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-16 1:32 Power-managing devices that are not of interest at some point in time Patrik Fimml
2014-07-16 10:00 ` Bastien Nocera
2014-07-16 14:17 ` Alan Stern
2014-07-16 16:14 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2014-07-16 18:08 ` Alan Stern
2014-07-16 18:55 ` Kevin Cernekee
2014-07-16 21:36 ` Oliver Neukum
2014-07-16 17:12 ` Benson Leung
2014-07-16 23:11 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-07-16 23:13 ` Bastien Nocera
2014-07-16 23:33 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-07-16 23:23 ` Bastien Nocera
2014-07-16 23:31 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2014-07-17 14:39 ` Alan Stern
2014-07-17 16:59 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2014-07-18 0:43 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-07-18 0:43 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2014-07-18 1:30 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-07-18 1:35 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-07-18 15:19 ` Alan Stern
2014-07-18 17:47 ` Patrik Fimml
2014-07-18 19:00 ` Alan Stern
2014-07-18 19:23 ` Patrik Fimml
2014-07-18 20:09 ` Alan Stern
2014-07-18 21:26 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2014-07-18 21:59 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-07-18 21:45 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2014-07-18 22:19 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-07-18 22:55 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-07-18 23:16 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2014-07-18 23:47 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-07-19 14:51 ` Alan Stern
2014-07-19 15:23 ` Benson Leung
2014-07-19 17:59 ` Alan Stern
2014-07-19 18:21 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2014-07-19 20:19 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-07-21 23:23 ` hadess
2014-07-28 19:58 ` Patrik Fimml
2014-07-28 20:01 ` Patrik Fimml [this message]
2014-07-17 6:01 ` Oliver Neukum
2014-07-16 23:17 ` Patrik Fimml
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140728200114.GB20708@google.com \
--to=patrikf@chromium.org \
--cc=bleung@google.com \
--cc=dtor@google.com \
--cc=hadess@hadess.net \
--cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).