From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Input: atmel_mxt_ts - fix a few issues reported by
 Coverity
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2014 09:14:11 -0700
Message-ID: <20140813161410.GA14682@core.coreip.homeip.net>
References: <20140811180307.GA25677@core.coreip.homeip.net>
 <53EA431F.6020908@itdev.co.uk>
 <53EA43A4.2070301@wwwdotorg.org>
 <53EA8260.4020306@itdev.co.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <53EA8260.4020306@itdev.co.uk>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: Nick Dyer <nick.dyer@itdev.co.uk>
Cc: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>, linux-input@vger.kernel.org, Yufeng Shen <miletus@chromium.org>, Benson Leung <bleung@chromium.org>, Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-input@vger.kernel.org

On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 10:08:48PM +0100, Nick Dyer wrote:
> On 12/08/14 17:41, Stephen Warren wrote:
> >> I've reviewed these changes and they look correct to me. Apologies that
> >> they slipped through, most of it is bad merging on my part I think.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Nick Dyer <nick.dyer@itdev.co.uk>
> > 
> > Don't you mean Acked-by or Reviewed-by?
> 
> You are right, Acked-by is probably more appropriate in this case.

OK, I put you as "asked-by" then.

Thanks.

-- 
Dmitry