From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dmitry Torokhov Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/3] cap11xx: Add support for various cap11xx devices Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2014 10:29:52 -0700 Message-ID: <20141010172952.GA32974@dtor-ws> References: <1412914983-3742-1-git-send-email-mranostay@gmail.com> <1412914983-3742-3-git-send-email-mranostay@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mail-pd0-f174.google.com ([209.85.192.174]:48803 "EHLO mail-pd0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751720AbaJJR35 (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Oct 2014 13:29:57 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1412914983-3742-3-git-send-email-mranostay@gmail.com> Sender: linux-input-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-input@vger.kernel.org To: Matt Ranostay Cc: galak@codeaurora.org, zonque@gmail.com, linux-input@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org Hi Matt, On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 09:23:02PM -0700, Matt Ranostay wrote: > @@ -63,7 +60,25 @@ struct cap11xx_priv { > struct input_dev *idev; > > /* config */ > - unsigned short keycodes[CAP11XX_NUM_CHN]; > + unsigned int num_channels; > + u32 keycodes[]; Any particular reason you decided to keep num_channels field givfen that the same data is accessible through priv->idev->keycodemax? Thanks. -- Dmitry