* Problems with Elantech touchpad in 3.18-rc2
@ 2014-10-30 17:14 Roel Aaij
2014-10-30 18:03 ` Dmitry Torokhov
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Roel Aaij @ 2014-10-30 17:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
Cc: dmitry.torokhov, linux-input
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2372 bytes --]
Dear kernel input developers,
While trying out 3.18-rc2, I noticed that the Elantech touchpad on my
laptop didn't work as intended anymore. Mouse movement and tapping one
finger worked, but scrolling and two finger tapping did not. X.org also
didn't recognise the touchpad as a synaptics touchpad anymore.
After googling around I found that i8042.nomux=0 brought it back to normal.
My laptop is a Clevo model W650SH with a keyboard and a touchpad attached,
and no touchschreen. Some output of dmesg is listed at the bottom, and the
result of dmidecode is attached.
Best regards,
Roel Aaij
Some dmesg output without i8042.nomux=0 (not fully functional touchpad)
[ 1.221297] i8042: PNP: PS/2 Controller [PNP0303:PS2K,PNP0f13:ELNM] at 0x60,0x64 irq 1,12
[ 1.226412] serio: i8042 KBD port at 0x60,0x64 irq 1
[ 1.226414] serio: i8042 AUX port at 0x60,0x64 irq 12
[ 1.229415] input: AT Translated Set 2 keyboard as /devices/platform/i8042/serio0/input/input6
[ 5.017142] psmouse serio1: elantech: assuming hardware version 3 (with firmware version 0x450f02)
[ 5.018055] psmouse serio1: elantech: elantech_send_cmd query 0x02 failed.
[ 5.018057] psmouse serio1: elantech: failed to query capabilities.
[ 5.930158] input: PS/2 Elantech Touchpad as /devices/platform/i8042/serio1/input/input8
Some dmesg output with i8042.nomux=0 (fully functional touchpad)
[ 1.361320] i8042: PNP: PS/2 Controller [PNP0303:PS2K,PNP0f13:ELNM] at 0x60,0x64 irq 1,12
[ 1.366134] i8042: Detected active multiplexing controller, rev 1.1
[ 1.367757] serio: i8042 KBD port at 0x60,0x64 irq 1
[ 1.367759] serio: i8042 AUX0 port at 0x60,0x64 irq 12
[ 1.367764] serio: i8042 AUX1 port at 0x60,0x64 irq 12
[ 1.367765] serio: i8042 AUX2 port at 0x60,0x64 irq 12
[ 1.367766] serio: i8042 AUX3 port at 0x60,0x64 irq 12
[ 1.371243] input: AT Translated Set 2 keyboard as /devices/platform/i8042/serio0/input/input6
[ 99.389964] psmouse serio2: elantech: assuming hardware version 3 (with firmware version 0x450f02)
[ 99.489797] psmouse serio2: elantech: Synaptics capabilities query result 0x79, 0x17, 0x0c.
[ 99.819119] input: ETPS/2 Elantech Touchpad as /devices/platform/i8042/serio2/input/input22
P.S. The late timestamps in the last few lines are due to a "modprobe -r psmouse && modprobe psmouse"
[-- Attachment #1.2: dmi --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 11352 bytes --]
# dmidecode 2.12
SMBIOS 2.7 present.
34 structures occupying 1874 bytes.
Table at 0x000EB500.
Handle 0x0000, DMI type 0, 24 bytes
BIOS Information
Vendor: American Megatrends Inc.
Version: 1.00.05
Release Date: 08/07/2013
Address: 0xF0000
Runtime Size: 64 kB
ROM Size: 4096 kB
Characteristics:
PCI is supported
BIOS is upgradeable
BIOS shadowing is allowed
Boot from CD is supported
Selectable boot is supported
EDD is supported
Print screen service is supported (int 5h)
8042 keyboard services are supported (int 9h)
Printer services are supported (int 17h)
ACPI is supported
USB legacy is supported
BIOS boot specification is supported
Targeted content distribution is supported
UEFI is supported
BIOS Revision: 4.6
Handle 0x0001, DMI type 1, 27 bytes
System Information
Manufacturer: Notebook
Product Name: W65_W670SH
Version: Not Applicable
Serial Number: Not Applicable
UUID: ECF59000-47ED-0000-0000-000000000000
Wake-up Type: Power Switch
SKU Number: Not Applicable
Family: Not Applicable
Handle 0x0002, DMI type 2, 15 bytes
Base Board Information
Manufacturer: Notebook
Product Name: W65_W670SH
Version: Not Applicable
Serial Number: Not Applicable
Asset Tag: Tag 12345
Features:
Board is a hosting board
Board is replaceable
Location In Chassis: Not Applicable
Chassis Handle: 0x0003
Type: Motherboard
Contained Object Handles: 0
Handle 0x0003, DMI type 3, 22 bytes
Chassis Information
Manufacturer: Notebook
Type: Laptop
Lock: Not Present
Version: N/A
Serial Number: None
Asset Tag: No Asset Tag
Boot-up State: Safe
Power Supply State: Safe
Thermal State: Safe
Security Status: None
OEM Information: 0x00000000
Height: Unspecified
Number Of Power Cords: 1
Contained Elements: 0
SKU Number: To be filled by O.E.M.
Handle 0x0004, DMI type 8, 9 bytes
Port Connector Information
Internal Reference Designator: J1A1
Internal Connector Type: None
External Reference Designator: PS2Mouse
External Connector Type: PS/2
Port Type: Mouse Port
Handle 0x0005, DMI type 8, 9 bytes
Port Connector Information
Internal Reference Designator: J1A1
Internal Connector Type: None
External Reference Designator: Keyboard
External Connector Type: PS/2
Port Type: Keyboard Port
Handle 0x0006, DMI type 8, 9 bytes
Port Connector Information
Internal Reference Designator: J2A1
Internal Connector Type: None
External Reference Designator: TV Out
External Connector Type: Mini Centronics Type-14
Port Type: Other
Handle 0x0007, DMI type 8, 9 bytes
Port Connector Information
Internal Reference Designator: J2A2A
Internal Connector Type: None
External Reference Designator: COM A
External Connector Type: DB-9 male
Port Type: Serial Port 16550A Compatible
Handle 0x0008, DMI type 8, 9 bytes
Port Connector Information
Internal Reference Designator: J2A2B
Internal Connector Type: None
External Reference Designator: Video
External Connector Type: DB-15 female
Port Type: Video Port
Handle 0x0009, DMI type 8, 9 bytes
Port Connector Information
Internal Reference Designator: J3A1
Internal Connector Type: None
External Reference Designator: USB1
External Connector Type: Access Bus (USB)
Port Type: USB
Handle 0x000A, DMI type 8, 9 bytes
Port Connector Information
Internal Reference Designator: J3A1
Internal Connector Type: None
External Reference Designator: USB2
External Connector Type: Access Bus (USB)
Port Type: USB
Handle 0x000B, DMI type 8, 9 bytes
Port Connector Information
Internal Reference Designator: J3A1
Internal Connector Type: None
External Reference Designator: USB3
External Connector Type: Access Bus (USB)
Port Type: USB
Handle 0x000C, DMI type 8, 9 bytes
Port Connector Information
Internal Reference Designator: J5A1
Internal Connector Type: None
External Reference Designator: LAN
External Connector Type: RJ-45
Port Type: Network Port
Handle 0x000D, DMI type 8, 9 bytes
Port Connector Information
Internal Reference Designator: J5A1
Internal Connector Type: None
External Reference Designator: USB4
External Connector Type: Access Bus (USB)
Port Type: USB
Handle 0x000E, DMI type 9, 17 bytes
System Slot Information
Designation: J6B2
Type: x16 PCI Express
Current Usage: In Use
Length: Long
ID: 0
Characteristics:
3.3 V is provided
Opening is shared
PME signal is supported
Bus Address: 0000:00:01.0
Handle 0x000F, DMI type 10, 8 bytes
On Board Device 1 Information
Type: Video
Status: Enabled
Description: To Be Filled By O.E.M.
On Board Device 2 Information
Type: Ethernet
Status: Enabled
Description: To Be Filled By O.E.M.
Handle 0x0010, DMI type 11, 5 bytes
OEM Strings
String 1: 1558
String 2: OEM String
String 3: To Be Filled By O.E.M.
String 4: To Be Filled By O.E.M.
String 5: BIOS:1.00.05
Handle 0x0011, DMI type 12, 5 bytes
System Configuration Options
Option 1: To Be Filled By O.E.M.
Handle 0x0012, DMI type 24, 5 bytes
Hardware Security
Power-On Password Status: Disabled
Keyboard Password Status: Disabled
Administrator Password Status: Disabled
Front Panel Reset Status: Disabled
Handle 0x0013, DMI type 32, 20 bytes
System Boot Information
Status: No errors detected
Handle 0x0014, DMI type 4, 42 bytes
Processor Information
Socket Designation: SOCKET 0
Type: Central Processor
Family: Core i7
Manufacturer: Intel
ID: C3 06 03 00 FF FB EB BF
Signature: Type 0, Family 6, Model 60, Stepping 3
Flags:
FPU (Floating-point unit on-chip)
VME (Virtual mode extension)
DE (Debugging extension)
PSE (Page size extension)
TSC (Time stamp counter)
MSR (Model specific registers)
PAE (Physical address extension)
MCE (Machine check exception)
CX8 (CMPXCHG8 instruction supported)
APIC (On-chip APIC hardware supported)
SEP (Fast system call)
MTRR (Memory type range registers)
PGE (Page global enable)
MCA (Machine check architecture)
CMOV (Conditional move instruction supported)
PAT (Page attribute table)
PSE-36 (36-bit page size extension)
CLFSH (CLFLUSH instruction supported)
DS (Debug store)
ACPI (ACPI supported)
MMX (MMX technology supported)
FXSR (FXSAVE and FXSTOR instructions supported)
SSE (Streaming SIMD extensions)
SSE2 (Streaming SIMD extensions 2)
SS (Self-snoop)
HTT (Multi-threading)
TM (Thermal monitor supported)
PBE (Pending break enabled)
Version: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-4700MQ CPU @ 2.40GHz
Voltage: 1.2 V
External Clock: 100 MHz
Max Speed: 3800 MHz
Current Speed: 2400 MHz
Status: Populated, Enabled
Upgrade: Socket rPGA988B
L1 Cache Handle: 0x0016
L2 Cache Handle: 0x0015
L3 Cache Handle: 0x0017
Serial Number: Not Specified
Asset Tag: Fill By OEM
Part Number: Fill By OEM
Core Count: 4
Core Enabled: 4
Thread Count: 8
Characteristics:
64-bit capable
Handle 0x0015, DMI type 7, 19 bytes
Cache Information
Socket Designation: CPU Internal L2
Configuration: Enabled, Not Socketed, Level 2
Operational Mode: Write Back
Location: Internal
Installed Size: 1024 kB
Maximum Size: 1024 kB
Supported SRAM Types:
Unknown
Installed SRAM Type: Unknown
Speed: Unknown
Error Correction Type: Single-bit ECC
System Type: Unified
Associativity: 8-way Set-associative
Handle 0x0016, DMI type 7, 19 bytes
Cache Information
Socket Designation: CPU Internal L1
Configuration: Enabled, Not Socketed, Level 1
Operational Mode: Write Back
Location: Internal
Installed Size: 256 kB
Maximum Size: 256 kB
Supported SRAM Types:
Unknown
Installed SRAM Type: Unknown
Speed: Unknown
Error Correction Type: Single-bit ECC
System Type: Other
Associativity: 8-way Set-associative
Handle 0x0017, DMI type 7, 19 bytes
Cache Information
Socket Designation: CPU Internal L3
Configuration: Enabled, Not Socketed, Level 3
Operational Mode: Write Back
Location: Internal
Installed Size: 6144 kB
Maximum Size: 6144 kB
Supported SRAM Types:
Unknown
Installed SRAM Type: Unknown
Speed: Unknown
Error Correction Type: Single-bit ECC
System Type: Unified
Associativity: 12-way Set-associative
Handle 0x0018, DMI type 16, 23 bytes
Physical Memory Array
Location: System Board Or Motherboard
Use: System Memory
Error Correction Type: None
Maximum Capacity: 32 GB
Error Information Handle: Not Provided
Number Of Devices: 4
Handle 0x0019, DMI type 17, 34 bytes
Memory Device
Array Handle: 0x0018
Error Information Handle: Not Provided
Total Width: 64 bits
Data Width: 64 bits
Size: 8192 MB
Form Factor: SODIMM
Set: None
Locator: ChannelA-DIMM0
Bank Locator: BANK 0
Type: DDR3
Type Detail: Synchronous
Speed: 1600 MHz
Manufacturer: 1315
Serial Number: 12230000
Asset Tag: 9876543210
Part Number: CT102464BF160B.C16
Rank: 2
Configured Clock Speed: 1600 MHz
Handle 0x001A, DMI type 20, 35 bytes
Memory Device Mapped Address
Starting Address: 0x00000000000
Ending Address: 0x001FFFFFFFF
Range Size: 8 GB
Physical Device Handle: 0x0019
Memory Array Mapped Address Handle: 0x001E
Partition Row Position: Unknown
Interleave Position: Unknown
Interleaved Data Depth: Unknown
Handle 0x001B, DMI type 17, 34 bytes
Memory Device
Array Handle: 0x0018
Error Information Handle: Not Provided
Total Width: Unknown
Data Width: Unknown
Size: No Module Installed
Form Factor: DIMM
Set: None
Locator: ChannelA-DIMM1
Bank Locator: BANK 1
Type: Unknown
Type Detail: None
Speed: Unknown
Manufacturer: [Empty]
Serial Number: [Empty]
Asset Tag: 9876543210
Part Number: [Empty]
Rank: Unknown
Configured Clock Speed: Unknown
Handle 0x001C, DMI type 17, 34 bytes
Memory Device
Array Handle: 0x0018
Error Information Handle: Not Provided
Total Width: Unknown
Data Width: Unknown
Size: No Module Installed
Form Factor: DIMM
Set: None
Locator: ChannelB-DIMM0
Bank Locator: BANK 2
Type: Unknown
Type Detail: None
Speed: Unknown
Manufacturer: [Empty]
Serial Number: [Empty]
Asset Tag: 9876543210
Part Number: [Empty]
Rank: Unknown
Configured Clock Speed: Unknown
Handle 0x001D, DMI type 17, 34 bytes
Memory Device
Array Handle: 0x0018
Error Information Handle: Not Provided
Total Width: Unknown
Data Width: Unknown
Size: No Module Installed
Form Factor: DIMM
Set: None
Locator: ChannelB-DIMM1
Bank Locator: BANK 3
Type: Unknown
Type Detail: None
Speed: Unknown
Manufacturer: [Empty]
Serial Number: [Empty]
Asset Tag: 9876543210
Part Number: [Empty]
Rank: Unknown
Configured Clock Speed: Unknown
Handle 0x001E, DMI type 19, 31 bytes
Memory Array Mapped Address
Starting Address: 0x00000000000
Ending Address: 0x001FFFFFFFF
Range Size: 8 GB
Physical Array Handle: 0x0018
Partition Width: 4
Handle 0x0022, DMI type 131, 64 bytes
OEM-specific Type
Header and Data:
83 40 22 00 31 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
F8 00 49 8C 00 00 00 00 01 20 00 00 00 00 09 00
7A 05 0D 00 00 00 00 00 C8 00 FF FF 00 00 00 00
00 00 00 00 66 00 00 00 76 50 72 6F 00 00 00 00
Handle 0x0023, DMI type 13, 22 bytes
BIOS Language Information
Language Description Format: Long
Installable Languages: 1
en|US|iso8859-1
Currently Installed Language: en|US|iso8859-1
Handle 0x0025, DMI type 127, 4 bytes
End Of Table
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 473 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: Problems with Elantech touchpad in 3.18-rc2
2014-10-30 17:14 Problems with Elantech touchpad in 3.18-rc2 Roel Aaij
@ 2014-10-30 18:03 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2014-10-30 19:06 ` Linus Torvalds
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Dmitry Torokhov @ 2014-10-30 18:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Roel Aaij; +Cc: linux-input, Linus Torvalds
Hi Roel,
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 06:14:09PM +0100, Roel Aaij wrote:
> Dear kernel input developers,
>
> While trying out 3.18-rc2, I noticed that the Elantech touchpad on my
> laptop didn't work as intended anymore. Mouse movement and tapping one
> finger worked, but scrolling and two finger tapping did not. X.org also
> didn't recognise the touchpad as a synaptics touchpad anymore.
>
> After googling around I found that i8042.nomux=0 brought it back to normal.
>
> My laptop is a Clevo model W650SH with a keyboard and a touchpad attached,
> and no touchschreen. Some output of dmesg is listed at the bottom, and the
> result of dmidecode is attached.
Argh, so quick search shows that there might be quite a few clones of
W650SH floating around, and I wonder if any of W650SF/W650SJ/W670SJQ/
W650SR/W650SZ exhibit the same behavior.
We might need to revert the nomux back to the original setting, although
I really do not want to do this: in my opinion it is better to have
touchpad revert to basic mode on affected laptops and work on
re-enabling MUX on them instead of having touchpad/keyboard completely
hosed from the get-go.
Linus, any guidance here? Can we live with such regression?
Thanks.
--
Dmitry
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: Problems with Elantech touchpad in 3.18-rc2
2014-10-30 18:03 ` Dmitry Torokhov
@ 2014-10-30 19:06 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-10-30 19:25 ` Dmitry Torokhov
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Linus Torvalds @ 2014-10-30 19:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dmitry Torokhov; +Cc: Roel Aaij, linux-input@vger.kernel.org
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 11:03 AM, Dmitry Torokhov
<dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Linus, any guidance here? Can we live with such regression?
No. If people are already finding machines with problems, that means
that there will be a lot of them once distributions move to that
kernel.
And I'd much rather maintain an old blacklist of broken machines, than
start from scratch and have a whitelist for machines that want muxing.
So I guess we'll need to revert and go back to the bad old days.
That said, before we do that, maybe we can find a middle ground for
the default behavior. The old behavior is to always try to mux if the
hw seems to support it. The new behavior is to never try to mux by
default. How about "try to mux if the controller seems to support it,
but if you don't actually find any muxed devices behind the
controller, go back to no-mux mode"?
Is there any way to do something like that? I don't actually know how
the heck people set up those touchpads, so maybe I'm just whistling in
the dark, and you can't even tell.
IOW, can we just enumerate the muxed devices, and see if they actually
use anything else than just index zero? Make the default a bit more
dynamic than just "all on" or "all off"?
Put another way: right now we do a lot of checking in
i8042_check_aux(), but we don't do *any* checking of the individual
muxed ports. Could we perhaps do some check per mux port? Do some
PSMOUSE_CMD_ENABLE thing and see if you get anything back?
Am I being crazy again?
Linus
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: Problems with Elantech touchpad in 3.18-rc2
2014-10-30 19:06 ` Linus Torvalds
@ 2014-10-30 19:25 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2014-10-31 16:24 ` Dmitry Torokhov
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Dmitry Torokhov @ 2014-10-30 19:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linus Torvalds; +Cc: Roel Aaij, linux-input@vger.kernel.org
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 12:06:03PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 11:03 AM, Dmitry Torokhov
> <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Linus, any guidance here? Can we live with such regression?
>
> No. If people are already finding machines with problems, that means
> that there will be a lot of them once distributions move to that
> kernel.
My only argument here is that failure is much less severe than with MUX
case: when in legacy mode the worst that is happening is that advanced
features (multi-touch, two-finger scroilling, etc) do not work so the
experience is similar to Windows box with no venrod drivers installed.
Whereas when active MUX does not work but we are tying to use it your
device is completely hosed.
>
> And I'd much rather maintain an old blacklist of broken machines, than
> start from scratch and have a whitelist for machines that want muxing.
>
> So I guess we'll need to revert and go back to the bad old days.
>
> That said, before we do that, maybe we can find a middle ground for
> the default behavior. The old behavior is to always try to mux if the
> hw seems to support it. The new behavior is to never try to mux by
> default. How about "try to mux if the controller seems to support it,
> but if you don't actually find any muxed devices behind the
> controller, go back to no-mux mode"?
>
> Is there any way to do something like that? I don't actually know how
> the heck people set up those touchpads, so maybe I'm just whistling in
> the dark, and you can't even tell.
>
> IOW, can we just enumerate the muxed devices, and see if they actually
> use anything else than just index zero? Make the default a bit more
> dynamic than just "all on" or "all off"?
>
> Put another way: right now we do a lot of checking in
> i8042_check_aux(), but we don't do *any* checking of the individual
> muxed ports. Could we perhaps do some check per mux port? Do some
> PSMOUSE_CMD_ENABLE thing and see if you get anything back?
Very often (most often) with broken MUX we do see the device, it simply
does not react properly (refuses to get enabled, fails to activate in
advanced mode, spews garbage into data stream, etc), so I don't think
that putting entire psmouse initialization sequence with all various
protocols into i8042_check_aux() is good idea.
And I have no idea whatsoever how they will behave if you try activating
MUX mode, try using it, and then deactivate. I think that code path is
even less travelled than active MUX one.
--
Dmitry
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: Problems with Elantech touchpad in 3.18-rc2
2014-10-30 19:25 ` Dmitry Torokhov
@ 2014-10-31 16:24 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2014-10-31 17:30 ` Pavel Machek
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Dmitry Torokhov @ 2014-10-31 16:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linus Torvalds
Cc: Roel Aaij, linux-input@vger.kernel.org, Jiri Kosina, Pavel Machek,
Hans de Goede
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 12:25:06PM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 12:06:03PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 11:03 AM, Dmitry Torokhov
> > <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Linus, any guidance here? Can we live with such regression?
> >
> > No. If people are already finding machines with problems, that means
> > that there will be a lot of them once distributions move to that
> > kernel.
>
> My only argument here is that failure is much less severe than with MUX
> case: when in legacy mode the worst that is happening is that advanced
> features (multi-touch, two-finger scroilling, etc) do not work so the
> experience is similar to Windows box with no venrod drivers installed.
> Whereas when active MUX does not work but we are tying to use it your
> device is completely hosed.
So I slept on it and I decided that we should indeed revert the patch,
since it causes more grief to people with good hardware than I
expected. We should not punish owners of good hardware because some
vendors can't write their firmware.
Thanks.
--
Dmitry
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: Problems with Elantech touchpad in 3.18-rc2
2014-10-31 16:24 ` Dmitry Torokhov
@ 2014-10-31 17:30 ` Pavel Machek
2014-10-31 17:35 ` Dmitry Torokhov
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Pavel Machek @ 2014-10-31 17:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dmitry Torokhov
Cc: Linus Torvalds, Roel Aaij, linux-input@vger.kernel.org,
Jiri Kosina, Hans de Goede
On Fri 2014-10-31 09:24:36, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 12:25:06PM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 12:06:03PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > > On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 11:03 AM, Dmitry Torokhov
> > > <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Linus, any guidance here? Can we live with such regression?
> > >
> > > No. If people are already finding machines with problems, that means
> > > that there will be a lot of them once distributions move to that
> > > kernel.
> >
> > My only argument here is that failure is much less severe than with MUX
> > case: when in legacy mode the worst that is happening is that advanced
> > features (multi-touch, two-finger scroilling, etc) do not work so the
> > experience is similar to Windows box with no venrod drivers installed.
> > Whereas when active MUX does not work but we are tying to use it your
> > device is completely hosed.
>
> So I slept on it and I decided that we should indeed revert the patch,
> since it causes more grief to people with good hardware than I
> expected. We should not punish owners of good hardware because some
> vendors can't write their firmware.
You can still add "for anything manufactured in 2015+, assume it does
not need MUX" and add a whitelist entry for any machine with external
ps/2 ports that still needs it... I guess there would be very little
of them made in 2015+.
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: Problems with Elantech touchpad in 3.18-rc2
2014-10-31 17:30 ` Pavel Machek
@ 2014-10-31 17:35 ` Dmitry Torokhov
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Dmitry Torokhov @ 2014-10-31 17:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pavel Machek
Cc: Linus Torvalds, Roel Aaij, linux-input@vger.kernel.org,
Jiri Kosina, Hans de Goede
On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 06:30:40PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> On Fri 2014-10-31 09:24:36, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 12:25:06PM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > > On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 12:06:03PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 11:03 AM, Dmitry Torokhov
> > > > <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Linus, any guidance here? Can we live with such regression?
> > > >
> > > > No. If people are already finding machines with problems, that means
> > > > that there will be a lot of them once distributions move to that
> > > > kernel.
> > >
> > > My only argument here is that failure is much less severe than with MUX
> > > case: when in legacy mode the worst that is happening is that advanced
> > > features (multi-touch, two-finger scroilling, etc) do not work so the
> > > experience is similar to Windows box with no venrod drivers installed.
> > > Whereas when active MUX does not work but we are tying to use it your
> > > device is completely hosed.
> >
> > So I slept on it and I decided that we should indeed revert the patch,
> > since it causes more grief to people with good hardware than I
> > expected. We should not punish owners of good hardware because some
> > vendors can't write their firmware.
>
> You can still add "for anything manufactured in 2015+, assume it does
> not need MUX" and add a whitelist entry for any machine with external
> ps/2 ports that still needs it... I guess there would be very little
> of them made in 2015+.
No, that Clevo W650SH that Roel has is a Haswell and is fairly recent
and has no external PS/2 ports and still wants to be in active MUX mode.
So we'll have to continue with the blacklist I'm afraid.
--
Dmitry
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-10-31 17:35 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-10-30 17:14 Problems with Elantech touchpad in 3.18-rc2 Roel Aaij
2014-10-30 18:03 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2014-10-30 19:06 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-10-30 19:25 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2014-10-31 16:24 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2014-10-31 17:30 ` Pavel Machek
2014-10-31 17:35 ` Dmitry Torokhov
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).