linux-input.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com>
To: Peter Wu <peter@lekensteyn.nl>
Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>,
	Nestor Lopez Casado <nlopezcasad@logitech.com>,
	Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>,
	linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] HID: logitech-hidpp: do not return the name length
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 20:33:50 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141211013350.GE4861@mail.corp.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1906623.oO6IMXUbli@al>

On Dec 11 2014 or thereabouts, Peter Wu wrote:
> On Wednesday 10 December 2014 18:01:52 Benjamin Tissoires wrote:
> > On Dec 10 2014 or thereabouts, Peter Wu wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 10 December 2014 17:21:09 Benjamin Tissoires wrote:
> > > > We do not make any use of the actual name length get through
> > > > hidpp_get_device_name().
> > > > 
> > > > We can drop the extra code and simplify the API a bit.
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com>
> > > >
> > > > ---
> > > >  drivers/hid/hid-logitech-hidpp.c | 10 +++-------
> > > >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> > > > 
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-logitech-hidpp.c b/drivers/hid/hid-logitech-hidpp.c
> > > > index 1a6395d..3846305 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/hid/hid-logitech-hidpp.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/hid/hid-logitech-hidpp.c
> > > > @@ -461,7 +461,7 @@ static int hidpp_devicenametype_get_device_name(struct hidpp_device *hidpp,
> > > >  	return count;
> > > >  }
> > > >  
> > > > -static char *hidpp_get_device_name(struct hidpp_device *hidpp, u8 *name_length)
> > > > +static char *hidpp_get_device_name(struct hidpp_device *hidpp)
> > > >  {
> > > >  	u8 feature_type;
> > > >  	u8 feature_index;
> > > > @@ -484,7 +484,6 @@ static char *hidpp_get_device_name(struct hidpp_device *hidpp, u8 *name_length)
> > > >  	if (!name)
> > > >  		goto out_err;
> > > >  
> > > > -	*name_length = __name_length + 1;
> > > >  	while (index < __name_length)
> > > >  		index += hidpp_devicenametype_get_device_name(hidpp,
> > > >  			feature_index, index, name + index,
> > > 
> > > hidpp_devicenametype_get_device_name can return a non-positive value if
> > > the USB device is unplugged at the wrong time, or if a malicious device
> > > is attached (and 0 is returned). An infinite loop is the result.
> > 
> > Oh, yes, you are definitively right.
> > 
> > > 
> > > Can you apply this change in the patch or should I send you a separate
> > > one?
> > 
> > Feel free to send your patch directly to the list.
> > 
> > > 
> > > 	while (index < __name_length) {
> > > 		ret = hidpp_devicenametype_get_device_name(hidpp,
> > > 			feature_index, index, name + index,
> > > 			__name_length - index);
> > > 		if (ret <= 0) {
> > > 			kfree(name);
> > > 			return NULL;
> > > 		}
> > > 		index += ret;
> > > 	}
> > > 
> > > > @@ -493,7 +492,6 @@ static char *hidpp_get_device_name(struct hidpp_device *hidpp, u8 *name_length)
> > > >  	return name;
> > > >  
> > > >  out_err:
> > > > -	*name_length = 0;
> > > >  	return NULL;
> > > 
> > > What about dropping the label out_err here and returning NULL in the
> > > previous places?
> > 
> > Yep, good idea. You can either send a patch for that if you want to take
> > credits, or I can send a v2. It's up to you.
> > 
> > Cheers,
> > Benjamin
> 
> I found another place where a boundary check is missing, but will treat
> that in a separate patch. If you send a v2 with the return NULL fixed
> up, I'll base my patch (to add a retval check) on yours.

OK. I am not sure I will be able to make it today or tomorrow. Feel free
to send the fixes right now if you can manage to send them now.

Cheers,
Benjamin

> 
> Kind regards,
> Peter
> 
> > > 
> > > >  }
> > > >  
> > > > @@ -989,7 +987,6 @@ static void hidpp_overwrite_name(struct hid_device *hdev, bool use_unifying)
> > > >  {
> > > >  	struct hidpp_device *hidpp = hid_get_drvdata(hdev);
> > > >  	char *name;
> > > > -	u8 name_length;
> > > >  
> > > >  	if (use_unifying)
> > > >  		/*
> > > > @@ -999,7 +996,7 @@ static void hidpp_overwrite_name(struct hid_device *hdev, bool use_unifying)
> > > >  		 */
> > > >  		name = hidpp_get_unifying_name(hidpp);
> > > >  	else
> > > > -		name = hidpp_get_device_name(hidpp, &name_length);
> > > > +		name = hidpp_get_device_name(hidpp);
> > > >  
> > > >  	if (!name)
> > > >  		hid_err(hdev, "unable to retrieve the name of the device");
> > > > @@ -1053,7 +1050,6 @@ static void hidpp_connect_event(struct hidpp_device *hidpp)
> > > >  	bool connected = atomic_read(&hidpp->connected);
> > > >  	struct input_dev *input;
> > > >  	char *name, *devm_name;
> > > > -	u8 name_length;
> > > >  
> > > >  	if (hidpp->quirks & HIDPP_QUIRK_CLASS_WTP)
> > > >  		wtp_connect(hdev, connected);
> > > > @@ -1080,7 +1076,7 @@ static void hidpp_connect_event(struct hidpp_device *hidpp)
> > > >  		return;
> > > >  	}
> > > >  
> > > > -	name = hidpp_get_device_name(hidpp, &name_length);
> > > > +	name = hidpp_get_device_name(hidpp);
> > > >  	if (!name) {
> > > >  		hid_err(hdev, "unable to retrieve the name of the device");
> > > >  	} else {
> > > > 
> 

      reply	other threads:[~2014-12-11  1:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-12-10 22:21 [PATCH 1/2] HID: logitech-hidpp: do not return the name length Benjamin Tissoires
2014-12-10 22:21 ` [PATCH 2/2] HID: logitech-hidpp: prefix the name with Logitech Benjamin Tissoires
2014-12-10 23:01   ` Peter Wu
2014-12-10 23:17     ` Benjamin Tissoires
2014-12-11 13:24       ` Peter Wu
2014-12-11 15:50         ` Benjamin Tissoires
2014-12-10 22:53 ` [PATCH 1/2] HID: logitech-hidpp: do not return the name length Peter Wu
2014-12-10 23:01   ` Benjamin Tissoires
2014-12-11  0:06     ` Peter Wu
2014-12-11  1:33       ` Benjamin Tissoires [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20141211013350.GE4861@mail.corp.redhat.com \
    --to=benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com \
    --cc=jkosina@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nlopezcasad@logitech.com \
    --cc=peter.hutterer@who-t.net \
    --cc=peter@lekensteyn.nl \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).