From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Michael Grzeschik Subject: Re: [PATCH] Input: da9052_tsi: remove unnecessary worker Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 12:04:30 +0100 Message-ID: <20150120110430.GC7404@pengutronix.de> References: <1421595368-31203-1-git-send-email-m.grzeschik@pengutronix.de> <20150120072100.GB36091@dtor-ws> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from metis.ext.pengutronix.de ([92.198.50.35]:36843 "EHLO metis.ext.pengutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754896AbbATLEc (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Jan 2015 06:04:32 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150120072100.GB36091@dtor-ws> Sender: linux-input-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-input@vger.kernel.org To: Dmitry Torokhov Cc: linux-input@vger.kernel.org, support.opensource@diasemi.com, kernel@pengutronix.de On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 11:21:00PM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > Hi Michael, > > On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 04:36:08PM +0100, Michael Grzeschik wrote: > > With the datardy irq we get the information if the > > pen got pulled from the screen. This patch changes > > the irq by checking this condition every time instead > > of triggering the worker. > > > > Signed-off-by: Michael Grzeschik > > --- > > drivers/input/touchscreen/da9052_tsi.c | 68 ++++++++++++++-------------------- > > 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/input/touchscreen/da9052_tsi.c b/drivers/input/touchscreen/da9052_tsi.c > > index 5a013bb..e6019dd 100644 > > --- a/drivers/input/touchscreen/da9052_tsi.c > > +++ b/drivers/input/touchscreen/da9052_tsi.c > > @@ -25,7 +25,6 @@ > > struct da9052_tsi { > > struct da9052 *da9052; > > struct input_dev *dev; > > - struct delayed_work ts_pen_work; > > struct mutex mutex; > > bool stopped; > > bool adc_on; > > @@ -47,8 +46,6 @@ static irqreturn_t da9052_ts_pendwn_irq(int irq, void *data) > > da9052_enable_irq(tsi->da9052, DA9052_IRQ_TSIREADY); > > > > da9052_ts_adc_toggle(tsi, true); > > - > > - schedule_delayed_work(&tsi->ts_pen_work, HZ / 50); > > } > > > > return IRQ_HANDLED; > > @@ -89,6 +86,33 @@ static void da9052_ts_read(struct da9052_tsi *tsi) > > y = ((y << 2) & 0x3fc) | ((v & 0xc) >> 2); > > z = ((z << 2) & 0x3fc) | ((v & 0x30) >> 4); > > > > + /* Check for last TSI_READY irq */ > > + if (!(ret & TSI_PEN_DOWN_STATUS)) { > > + > > + /* Pen UP */ > > + da9052_ts_adc_toggle(tsi, false); > > Now it is racy WRT tsi->adc_on checks in da9052_ts_input_close(); > previously we'd disable pendown IRQ and cancel the work, so no one > would be touching tsi->adc_on. I have been testing this and did not run into any race. But ok, that resource should probably be surrounded by some locking. I will give it a try. > Also I'd rather we did event reporting in this function, but do IRQ > switchover in da9052_ts_datardy_irq(). Sounds good in aspect of code structure. Thanks, Michael -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |