From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mika Westerberg Subject: Re: About Goodix-TS on Bay Trail, and ACPI and interrupts Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 12:09:57 +0200 Message-ID: <20150121100957.GL1850@lahna.fi.intel.com> References: <20150117010306.7e32b72524e4c0cf8296bbac@ao2.it> <20150119153758.GA18115@mail.corp.redhat.com> <20150120100548.GG1850@lahna.fi.intel.com> <20150120163152.GB23441@mail.corp.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mga03.intel.com ([134.134.136.65]:62126 "EHLO mga03.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753237AbbAUKKC (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Jan 2015 05:10:02 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150120163152.GB23441@mail.corp.redhat.com> Sender: linux-input-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-input@vger.kernel.org To: Benjamin Tissoires Cc: Antonio Ospite , linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, Bastien Nocera , Mathias Nyman On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 11:31:52AM -0500, Benjamin Tissoires wrote: > > What makes you think it should use the goodix driver? > > The fact that the 3.19-rc4 log says: > [ 2.424370] i2c_hid i2c-GODX0911:01: unexpected HID descriptor bcdVersion (0x0000) > > Which is rather troublesome and shows that we might have received a 0 > answer when requesting the HID descriptor. Then Antonio tried to poke > the device with the goodix driver and got a better answer from the > version point of view. Right, I missed that from the logs.