From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Darren Hart Subject: Re: [ibm-acpi-devel] [PATCH 1/7] thinkpad_acpi: Remember adaptive kbd presence Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2015 10:09:34 -0800 Message-ID: <20150306180934.GE19001@vmdeb7> References: <1424443450.22910.13.camel@hadess.net> <20150226061814.GC7331@fury.dvhart.com> <1425035130.1995042.233191101.57145444@webmail.messagingengine.com> <1425035779.2000837.233193809.65561A3E@webmail.messagingengine.com> <20150303165225.GD83894@vmdeb7> <1425407994.1004750.235001957.08166EE5@webmail.messagingengine.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]:54327 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752614AbbCFSJ4 (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Mar 2015 13:09:56 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1425407994.1004750.235001957.08166EE5@webmail.messagingengine.com> Sender: linux-input-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-input@vger.kernel.org To: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh Cc: Bastien Nocera , Jiri Kosina , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, ibm-acpi-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-input@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 03:39:54PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > On Tue, Mar 3, 2015, at 13:52, Darren Hart wrote: > > Henrique, I believe I may have overstepped with thinkpad-acpi and dealt > > with it like the other drivers in platform/drivers/x86, when instead I should > > have been leaving it to you. My apologies, it was not intentional. > > No harm done! And I did appreciate the extra help :-) > > > Do you typically send pull-requests for the thinkpad-acpi driver directly to Linus? > > thinkpad-acpi is part of the platform-x86 subsystem, so IMHO it should > continue to be merged through your tree if you are okay with that. > > I'd really appreciate if the typical patch approval flux would go > through me first. However, I certainly don't mind if you merge patches > directly should I be unresponsible for some reason, or when they are > part of the usual tree-wide spot fixes for some pattern/anti-pattern, > etc. > > > I would be more than happy to basically ignore anything to thinkpad-acpi until > > after you have provided a review. I can also roll up pull requests from > > you if you prefer to integrate into the platform-drivers-x86 tree as the path to > > Linus. > > Well, if it is fine with you, I'd suggest we continue with the process > used in this patchset, where I will reply to patches in this ML with a > reviewed-by or acked-by before you merge them. > > If you want to change that at some point, just drop me a note and I will > start pushing patches to you either through this ML or through signed > pull requests, whichever you prefer. Great. Things are documented correctly in MAINTAINERS then and we can continue as before, only I will be more diligent making sure you are Cc'd and have responded to any thinkpad-acpi.c changes. I assume two weeks is sufficient, but may nag you after a week. Thanks! -- Darren Hart Intel Open Source Technology Center