Re: [PATCH] input: improve usage of gpiod API

[Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>]

On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 10:38:47PM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> Hello Dmitry,
> 
> On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 11:47:13AM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > Since 39b2bbe3d715 (gpio: add flags argument to gpiod_get*() functions)
> > which appeared in v3.17-rc1, the gpiod_get* functions take an additional
> > parameter that allows to specify direction and initial value for
> > output. Simplify drivers accordingly.
> > 
> > Note that in the case of the drv260x driver error checking is more
> > strict now because -ENOSYS is reported to the caller now. But this
> > should only be returned if GPIOLIB is disabled which shouldn't happen as
> > the driver depends on GPIOLIB.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
> > ---
> >  drivers/input/keyboard/clps711x-keypad.c |  7 +------
> >  drivers/input/misc/drv260x.c             | 13 ++++---------
> >  drivers/input/misc/gpio-beeper.c         |  7 +------
> >  3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
> are you willing to take this? I intend to make the flags parameter
> mandatory for 4.3 and so if this change doesn't make it into 4.2-rc1,
> would it be ok for you if I send it as part of the series that makes
> flags required?

Yes, I am sorry, applied now.

Thanks.

-- 
Dmitry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html