From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dmitry Torokhov Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] input: touchscreen: pixcir_i2c_ts: Add support for optional wakeup interrupt Date: Sun, 19 Jul 2015 23:24:07 -0700 Message-ID: <20150720062407.GA13092@dtor-ws> References: <1437367814-27785-1-git-send-email-vigneshr@ti.com> <1437367814-27785-2-git-send-email-vigneshr@ti.com> <20150720060929.GW17550@atomide.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150720060929.GW17550@atomide.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Tony Lindgren Cc: Vignesh R , Benoit Cousson , Rob Herring , Pawel Moll , Mark Rutland , Ian Campbell , Kumar Gala , Russell King , Roger Quadros , Henrik Rydberg , Frodo Lai , Jingoo Han , linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-input@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-input@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Jul 19, 2015 at 11:09:30PM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote: > * Vignesh R [150719 21:53]: > > @@ -445,6 +443,8 @@ static struct pixcir_ts_platform_data *pixcir_parse_dt(struct device *dev) > > dev_dbg(dev, "%s: x %d, y %d, gpio %d\n", __func__, > > pdata->x_max + 1, pdata->y_max + 1, pdata->gpio_attb); > > > > + pdata->wakeirq = of_irq_get_byname(dev->of_node, "wakeupirq"); > > + > > return pdata; > > What about handling -EPROVE_DEFER here? At least pinctrl-single can be > be a loadable module for the dedicated wakeirqs. Right. I think we should only allow -ENODATA to continue and return error in all other cases. Also, I think "irq" suffix on name is redundant. Thanks. -- Dmitry